Give us the option for GAC.

Some are

"Haugs;c-2457564" wrote:

"TVF;c-2457562" wrote:

"Haugs;c-2457520" wrote:
These forums have a terrible habit of missing the forest through the trees.

Think it’s fair to say the grand majority of the player base prefers 5v5 to 3v3. I count myself among them. If you’re reading this and wondering “proof?”, just stop, please. It’s disingenuous.

I'd argue that making up statistics or citing an unscientific non-representative poll is disingenuous.

Most people aren’t doing that, though, that I’ve seen

73.6% of all statistics are made up.

The best part of 3v3 is getting matched up vs players that hate it and don't try. Give me a stress free easy win any day. If people are allowed to opt out then we don't get those easy matchups. Forget that.

"Ranzono;c-2457908" wrote:
To those that hate 3v3,
Get good

Pretty much, same people that hate 3 vs 3 hate matchmaking and just want a long series of easy mindless wins.

I saw a poll that showed this was the case 95% of the time.

"Hawthorne;c-2457686" wrote:
The best part of 3v3 is getting matched up vs players that hate it and don't try. Give me a stress free easy win any day. If people are allowed to opt out then we don't get those easy matchups. Forget that.

This is why 20% of people prefer 3 vs 3. It’s not the gameplay they like, it’s the disproportionate awards they get.

The gameplay is awful. It’s like playing baseball with a 5 man lineup instead of 9. It’s like playing monopoly with 25 players instead of 2 to 6. The game wasn’t built or intended to be played like this so naturally the gameplay sucks. Let’s add a 12 vs 12 GAC throw that at the wall and see if that sticks to.

I love random stats that people pull out of thin air.

Around 10vs10 would be interesting. I'd play that.

86v86

5v3

I am honestly curious about 6v6 with an extra leader slot. I think that would be interesting