Grand arena Draw suggestion

Since time zones exist, I disagree.

"PrettyFly4QuiGuy;c-2421027" wrote:

"FenderMan;c-2421026" wrote:

"PrettyFly4QuiGuy;c-2421024" wrote:

"FenderMan;c-2421022" wrote:
Lower GP then, I think my explanation as to why the lower GP player deserves it more having a better focus on GAC makes sense.

I disagree, the one with the larger investment in the game should win, no change needed

Err having a higher GP doesn't mean higher investment in the game.

I could be a burgeoning whale.

That’s what I meant by investment(higher GP = more invested in game), sorry it wasn’t clear

I see your point investment is not only in forms of money but also time. And having a higher GP can mean either one of both.

That means that as a community we advocate that we give more privilege to people having been there for longer.

On the opposite hand, we could try to cater to new members of our community,

I guess that's what's it's all about.

Makes senses, thx for the input

"CamaroAMF;c-2420417" wrote:
Since time zones exist, I disagree.

I still disagree with the highest GP win, I think it should be a random winner in that case.

More context as to why I believe highest GP shouldn't win.

If two people end up with the same result (draw) the one with the lower power has had a better focus to get him to this GAC result.

By that I mean that the highest GP player either doesn't use his rooster properly or decided to get characters that aren't as good in GAC.

For example, at my lvl, I see many people going for SLKR or they have SLKR. Those players end up having a rooster mainly of FO which sucks overall in GAC.

I end up beating that guy because I have better synergy overall and have worked on counters for most team.

But that guy has a much higher GP.

It makes much more sense that actually the lowest GP player should get the win.

But I believe this community doesn't believe that the underdog should win.

Therefore I think at a minimum it should be random.

Lower GP then, I think my explanation as to why the lower GP player deserves it more having a better focus on GAC makes sense.

"FenderMan;c-2421022" wrote:
Lower GP then, I think my explanation as to why the lower GP player deserves it more having a better focus on GAC makes sense.

I disagree, the one with the larger investment in the game should win, no change needed

"PrettyFly4QuiGuy;c-2421024" wrote:

"FenderMan;c-2421022" wrote:
Lower GP then, I think my explanation as to why the lower GP player deserves it more having a better focus on GAC makes sense.

I disagree, the one with the larger investment in the game should win, no change needed

Err having a higher GP doesn't mean higher investment in the game.

I could be a burgeoning whale.

"FenderMan;c-2421026" wrote:

"PrettyFly4QuiGuy;c-2421024" wrote:

"FenderMan;c-2421022" wrote:
Lower GP then, I think my explanation as to why the lower GP player deserves it more having a better focus on GAC makes sense.

I disagree, the one with the larger investment in the game should win, no change needed

Err having a higher GP doesn't mean higher investment in the game.

I could be a burgeoning whale.

That’s what I meant by investment(higher GP = more invested in game), sorry it wasn’t clear

"DarjeloSalas;c-2421028" wrote:

"FenderMan;c-2421026" wrote:

"PrettyFly4QuiGuy;c-2421024" wrote:

"FenderMan;c-2421022" wrote:
Lower GP then, I think my explanation as to why the lower GP player deserves it more having a better focus on GAC makes sense.

I disagree, the one with the larger investment in the game should win, no change needed

Err having a higher GP doesn't mean higher investment in the game.

I could be a burgeoning whale.

In that case your opponent deserves the win for drawing with a superior player.

The lower GP has had a better focus on having good teams for GAC.

What do you even mean by superior player?