Grand Arena Scoring Loophole/Flaw..?
Hey, hope this is the right place to put this. After seeing the results of one of my guildmate's Grand Arena matchups it seems that there is a flaw or loophole in the way the game awards the "Banners"...
Forum Discussion
"Boov;c-1716912" wrote:"Beeblebrox;c-1716910" wrote:"Edison;c-1716905" wrote:"Beeblebrox;c-1716902" wrote:
Yeah Edison, maybe "good" isn't the right word, lol, I was trying to give them scenario names that went from worst to best and was running out of "middling" descriptors :smile:
Haha. I run into that problem when I'm sending emails at work and the client keeps messaging back and I keep running out of friendly endings "Regards" "Thanks so much!" "Let me know if you need anything else" "Uh... Bye?"
I can appreciate validating the viability of a game mode, especially one that figures will be important once it's in full swing. I ended up winning my battle, and it came down to the opponent having one extra attempt on one battle on one zone, and that was the difference maker. It felt good, but it put into perspective just how important that first offensive effort is.
Yeah I work in support some days, I know those clients!!
I got beat in my Grand Arena but deserted to lose, they had 1 awesome squad that I had no way to beat - oh well, try again next time - I just don't want people to see not putting defences in 1 sector as a viable win option as this new game mode gets more mature as it could ruin the fun of it
well, math isn't for everyone, so don't feel bad. Glad i could help ;)
None of that mentioned any math, clearly your reading abilities haven't improved!
