I think I would need to see data on how bad your match ups are or more importantly how often before agreeing there is a problem that needs solving. The occasional wonky match up will happen but whilst I have been in several guilds with activity requirements to TW sign up (resulting in 35-45 participation typically) no one is playing the system. We are more concerned with losing to similar or larger guilds with high activity, which is far more typical in our match ups (approx 580M guild at the moment).
Well, discussions like this thread and several others would not exist if this problem did not exist. That should be proof enough....
But nonetheless, it happens often enough that after my guild loses two TWs, we are assigned a “weak” opponent who brings significantly fewer GP into the match (as it should be), but then turns out to be a completely overpowered guild with only 35 people.
The TW system is broken for higher levels. And rewards haven't been up to date for a long time. Reroll mats are the only thing interesting about it.
These threads exist because players want to win more and blame the game or other players when they do not. It is not proof of an actual problem which needs fixing.
Higher reward tiers would be welcomed, we would actually get more even with just 43 players this time.
BTW our opponent was even tougher than us. So please tell me how “sandbagging” and allowing 7 players to sit out because of RL fixes our matches so we always win.
This is just a losing conspiracy and much better to focus on your guilds activity and TW readiness if you want to win more. Or focus on other modes with more ROI.
You seem pretty defensive about this post. As if there's merit to it, though you claim it's just a conspiracy.
And that sounds something a conspiracy theorist says. If I call something ridiculous I agree with it? Just think about how ridiculous that is, or am I agreeing with you. Should I say that actually makes sense so you know I disagree with you 😂.
Capital Games Team
