Is it against the terms of service

"BobcatSkywalker;c-2090006" wrote:

"Kyno;c-2089966" wrote:
I will also add, that if we were not 4+ years into the game that I would think this game mode having a monthly (or whatever) swap like you suggest would be a problem. The issue of fairness I bring up now have to do with the fact that there is already some "homeostasis" to the system and that a change of this nature without a lot of care in the implementation would really drive away players and cause major issues.


also, without other measures in place they wouldn't solve the problem. the group of players that would be involved in the swaps would still be finite, and therefore could lead to a larger system that would figure out shards and organize chats within a day or 2 of each swap.

I'm with you 100% on this - if CG did change this to try to make it better or would just get worse.

Cg would make a change without a lot of care or thought about how it should work and totally screw all of us... so your probally right it's better just keeping the mafias.

My shard is so old there is only like 100 to 200 people left active anyways I cant even drop past 250 with a 1 man team.

We have about 70 in a shard chat. I remember when it was like 6 if of us in the chat.

If your not a part of the shard chat and you try to climb good luck but I guess anyone who wants in the chat would be in it already. I dont know why people try to beat people without joining the chat but they do.

They should know it's part if the game by now. Some people still seem to try to climb everyday. There always seems to be a few new names every couple months that get marked as a target to hit anytime we see and we keep them out if the top 50 to 100 whenever we see them. Eventually the name drops and we never see them again or they find out that they have to be in the chat to climb. That's been my experiance. It feels more like a club than actual competition.

I'm glad we can agree that if they used your method without considerations it would mess things up more than help.

Our chat is not as big, a few still climb without reaching out to us. We run fairly independent hours so we dont target anyone unless we are actively moving up. Last recent player to stop is at 300 with a revan team. That being said, my alt which I have not played in a while is about 1 year old and is in the 3k area. As we both said, they are all different.

I believe they have acknowledged it to some extent, but not in any way that suggests they are looking at methods to change things.