Forum Discussion
MasterSeedy
5 years agoSeasoned Ace
@Waqui
In the particular scenario you're using to infer something, Kyno specified that the two players share a payout. '
So the proposal is not asking you to know someone else's Payout. It's assuming that you know your own payout and talking about the situations other than near your own payout ... which happens to also be the other player's.
It's merely inelegant writing b/c Kyno knew those two payouts were the same, but mentioning the other player's payout first implies (without stating) that it's because of the other player's payout that certain conditions apply. In fact it's only because of your own payout. The "because" was never overtly stated, it just seems - erroneously - to be a reasonable inference.
I'm pretty sure that's how the whole confusion happened.
In the particular scenario you're using to infer something, Kyno specified that the two players share a payout. '
So the proposal is not asking you to know someone else's Payout. It's assuming that you know your own payout and talking about the situations other than near your own payout ... which happens to also be the other player's.
It's merely inelegant writing b/c Kyno knew those two payouts were the same, but mentioning the other player's payout first implies (without stating) that it's because of the other player's payout that certain conditions apply. In fact it's only because of your own payout. The "because" was never overtly stated, it just seems - erroneously - to be a reasonable inference.
I'm pretty sure that's how the whole confusion happened.
Featured Places
SWGOH General Discussion
Discuss and share your feedback on Star Wars: Galaxy of Heroes with fellow players.Latest Activity: 8 minutes agoCommunity Highlights
- CG_Meathead8 months ago
Capital Games Team