4 years ago
Kenobi requirements [MERGE]
Locking GL Kenobi behind a TB mission that requires your guild mates to be able to do it is completely unfair and unreasonable. If you're in a guild that you really enjoy but it can't or is barely abl...
"RandomSithLord;c-2267654" wrote:"Nikoms565;c-2267652" wrote:"RandomSithLord;c-2267551" wrote:"Jo0121;c-2267372" wrote:"MaruMaru;c-2267371" wrote:"Bladegunner;c-2267333" wrote:
Good read so far.
I'm definitely on the side of GR vs Separatist. Either a new GG or Dooku would be fun.
Will KAM be required. Unlikely for Kenobi unlikely for the next one. People just don't have him unlocked and most are not even close to having him unlocked.
I'd say kam is unlikely for kenobi and likely for next one. Many people have him finished and more will have that as months pass. I doubt cg will have problems making one gl more exclusive.
I don't think KAM will be required for anything anytime soon. That is just bad business."Jo0121;c-2267375" wrote:"MaruMaru;c-2267373" wrote:"Jo0121;c-2267372" wrote:"MaruMaru;c-2267371" wrote:"Bladegunner;c-2267333" wrote:
Good read so far.
I'm definitely on the side of GR vs Separatist. Either a new GG or Dooku would be fun.
Will KAM be required. Unlikely for Kenobi unlikely for the next one. People just don't have him unlocked and most are not even close to having him unlocked.
I'd say kam is unlikely for kenobi and likely for next one. Many people have him finished and more will have that as months pass. I doubt cg will have problems making one gl more exclusive.
I don't think KAM will be required for anything anytime soon. That is just bad business.
I don't agree, you have 5 other gls to collect. This depends on kam completion and close to completion rates we can't possibly know.
Less than 3000 people have 7* KAM, 20k unlocked him. Unless they are planning to release next GL in November I don't see him being a requirement. For anything anytime soon. And why would he need to be a requirement? Just because of Wat?
It's anything but bad business. A good portion of those 3000 are the long term committed players, and spenders among those 3000 (there are F2P too obviously) might account for more of the revenue than most of the other players combined.
Sometimes it's not bad to offer something to those players too instead of making every GL a giveaway.
You are making a great number of assumptions (and an exaggeration to boot) to make your theory plausible. And one of your assumptions actually works against your theory - namely if they DO account for more revenue, making Kam the "difficult" requirement is handing it to those 3k players for free.
The point of the argument was to keep the said players around, not how much they actually spend on a GL.
It's not just the heavy spenders, but many long time players in general that are getting fed up with 4m players with SEE as their only GL and 15 total g13s that are suddenly climbing in shards where to top has an average of 6m+ GP. From time to time some exclusivity in a potential new meta is not a bad thing.