JML doesn’t cost 25k crystals to get to 7* and make him useable and Chimera requires no Omis. I’m okay with Chimera being a solid counter, I just think it should have a bit more RNG or at least more pilot investment if it’s going to win 90%+ of the time. Even with an R3 Iden, I’ve lost once in over a dozen matches.
"Itsa_me_Malario;c-2438926" wrote:
"Dawnsinger;c-2438911" wrote:
3 of the 5 ships you need to beat Levi have come out in the past 18 months, and using them gives up a Prof and a Exec counter. This is clearly a one generation ago counter. I’m with you that it probably shouldn’t be as reliable as it is, but the three generations ago argument is red herring.
"WookieWookie;c-2438868" wrote:
I'm going to agree with OP and while I don't mind low win % counters from a one-generation ago meta, this is almost a 100% counter from a three generations ago meta (Levi==>Prof/Exec==>Nego/Malev==>Chim/H1+Falcon), and is almost certainly more deserving of a 'fix' than a one-generation old counter. This would be like JMK getting beat by GAS. (and they nerfed GAS against GLs before the release of the second gen of GLs).
2 out of the 5 ships needed are straight out of the conquest, if that is a problem, than malgus needs to be nerfed because it kills JML, same with any conquest unit that can beat galactic legend
