Mandos mandatory for GC now?

"th3evo;c-2223990" wrote:
Name a more iconic duo. I'll wait:
TVF and Kyno + defending anything and everything CG does.

Kyno has some advantages not doing it for free (if i remember right - Kyno can correct me if i am wrong) .

TVF is just well known hater. He always goes against others.

Btw you have to understand CG is just monetizing everything (like all US companies do) and all you can do is to deal with it or stop using it. Others say it is capitalism

"HondoOhnaka;c-2224235" wrote:

"th3evo;c-2223990" wrote:
Name a more iconic duo. I'll wait:
TVF and Kyno + defending anything and everything CG does.

Kyno has some advantages not doing it for free (if i remember right - Kyno can correct me if i am wrong) .

TVF is just well known hater. He always goes against others.

I can see you don't actually read my posts. I go against unreasonable complaining, incorrect statements, and bad faith arguments.

"th3evo;c-2224243" wrote:

"MaruMaru;c-2224231" wrote:

"th3evo;c-2224226" wrote:

"MaruMaru;c-2224215" wrote:

"th3evo;c-2224212" wrote:

"MaruMaru;c-2224175" wrote:

"th3evo;c-2224173" wrote:

"NicWester;c-2224103" wrote:

"th3evo;c-2224049" wrote:

"Gorgus;c-2224020" wrote:
Perhaps you’ve overlooked the simple possibility that others just don’t share your opinions.

You don't have to share my opinion. You also don't have to defend CG, they can do it themselves.

Your definition of "defending CG" is "disagreeing with me." This is a bad faith line of reason.

I don't understand how you can disagree with my criticism of TVF, Kyno and CG but not defend them at the same time when you decide to comment.

see Cambridge Dictionary definition of "DEFEND"
"to protect someone or something against attack or criticism; to speak in favour of someone or something"
or Merriam-Webster definition
"to maintain or support in the face of argument or hostile criticism"

Simple. You don't imagine the option people are actually expressing their own opinion and only evaluate it based on which position it benefits (love/hate cg). As stated above, that's a bad faith argument.

English is not my first language so I don't think I fully understand what you are trying to say. I can't stand behind my own opinion?

Hmm, not even implied that. Others can do as well without being part of your imaginary bunching them up or dichotomic thinking that one either defends cg if they don't hate something, or they have to hate it wholesome (regardless of the topic) or they are defending cg/eachother.

See "bad faith argument".

Well, I respond to comments that I disagree with but if I do that people call it "bad faith argument" because I'm evaluating them based on which position they benefit. Why would I respond to comments I agree with?
I'm not the one who brought up the dichotomy. You did with the "love/hate cg". I've never said that you have to either love or hate them with nothing in between. So please stop putting words in my mouth.
Whenever you comment in support of CG/someone (when it comes to criticism) you are by definition "defending" them. For example I defended CG when it came to account sharing (because I don't like account sharing). You can always disagree quietly to avoid defending them.

Lolol, I'm the one putting words in your mouth? Thanks for uttering the same words yourself right after proving my point. By all means, please keep on with dichotomical thinking.

I've never talked about love or hate. But feel free to live in denial of the word "defend". I guess it scares you but let me assure you there is nothing to be afraid of. It won't hurt you.

I speak my opinion in a discussion, which is what everyone is having here. The only people who see me as defending CG, are the ones who think they need to attack them. Some(most I hope) are just here to talk and discuss points on both sides and dont attack/defend as a point of merit,but I guess by strick definition you can choose to define someone's comments how you choose, but that doesnt mean that is the intent behind their actions.

Don’t worry in March they release a 3rd Mando in a new event and March GC will require him

"LordDirt;c-2223046" wrote:
Character collecting game. Collect them all and get them all to 7*.

"Ultra;c-2223038" wrote:

"Antario;d-241035" wrote:
Does that mean if you don't have decent mando characters moving forward you can kiss bye bye to the red crate?

That applies to all player factions, not just mandos

I get that. But my point is practically all GCs have mando related feats now. Or are they going to remove the Beskar Mando feat from the others? I don't think so.

"Ravenlock;c-2223040" wrote:
True but half of the next GC tied to one faction? So much for variety.
Also the newest faction with the worst synergy but whatever.

They will probably be doing this moving forward with any new toon/faction. At least with the faction we have transparency. Hopefully they will do that with new toons required as well in the future. We get double the rewards now though since they are twice a week. So just do your best every time, or whale if you want red crate every time! The way this game keeps going is stuff like this. Other mobile games push this type of stuff a lot harder, so I’m happy this is on lesser events in the game. But hey, it’s more stuff to work on! At least we have a few older Mando toons to use (Jango, Sabine, GS and ISC).

"Nikoms565;c-2223076" wrote:

"TVF;c-2223060" wrote:
Lol at anyone surprised by this.

Honestly, I wasn't surprised by the BAM feats every other GC. I am a little surprised that instead of rotating factions, they have the same faction every other GC. It's almost like they are intentionally trying to make the game mode less interesting and more repetitive.

I mean I realize that the game is Star Wars: Grinding of Heroes, but this seems an odd choice....even for CG.

What happened to Galaxy of Hoarding?

Tough decision whether to put some resources into getting Beskar Mando to ensure maximum GC rewards or just hoard and ignore

2 scenarios imo:

1) "faction of the month": The same faction 4 times in GC and feats for this faction in GAC
2) Mandalorian become the "GC Faction" and will appear 4 times each month. It gives them a purpose.

I like both, as long as we know about it; it means you'll have strategic choices to make.

"MaruMaru;c-2223108" wrote:
Imo this month the way this is unfolding is mostly revealed. It's not bam or mandos, it's the latest thing or overall faction that involves the latest thing.

This progression gets rid of the problem bam feat introduced. Last month we needed already well developed faction which was interrupted by a completely unthematical need (bam) in extra. If their thinking is how I read it, I have no objection to the current state of affairs (whether I'm on the losing side or not).

That might well be the case. However, the criticism I want to make is, it takes away game-play diversity. We are more or less "forced" to constantly chase after the latest toys CG is dumping on us (not only for whalers but also F2P, because GC is all about mods, which is one of few areas where F2P can shine with time invested). That overall would be less painful, if the latest toys are really viable and improve your overall gameplay, which sadly is not the case at the moment with the mando faction. I can do well in TB, TW, GAC and Arena without any of them.

Don't take me wrong. I like new content, be it new toons or new game modes. But I don't like how it currently seems to be: mando or nothing else.

This is ridiculous.