"CG_Doja_Fett_MINI;c-2292617" wrote:
"Calbion;c-2292572" wrote:
"CG_Doja_Fett_MINI;c-2292517" wrote:
"TVF;c-2292507" wrote:
I'm not sure "several" covers it lol.
"Various" felt too vague and "cornucopia" seems too festive.
I get the attempt at humour to mitigate some of the tension but this is an infuriating flippant response to the player community.
It was a response to TVF's post. The issue itself is being taken very seriously by everyone in the studio, including me.
If you don't like how I choose to interact with the community, feel free to let EA know.
@CG_Doja_Fett_MINI your interaction with the community is pretty good in my opinion. What has not been good lately is the direction things are going with the game. We have had more waves of bugs then in ls geo Tb. Testing seems to be a huge issue lately and the need for more or better testing needs to take place sooner rather than later.
As for conquest, the energy cost vs various feat is way too much. I like the the wide array of feats to get but two things are lacking. 1) energy cost needs to be reverted if we are gonna have this many feat of varying teams. Keep all the feats and add a tracker for them since there are so many now. Keep energy to swap data disk. Add a free 45 energy daily like every other energy we have currently, once a day would be plenty. 2) limit the amount of refreshes that can be done during a conquest if you guys are worried about blowing through it. Limiting it to two refreshes would be fair. Also if you are worried about the money raise the crystal cost to 100 per refresh. You guys get your money and we stay engaged.