"Droideka;c-1784161" wrote:
"RAYRAY;c-1784153" wrote:
"Sarbitar;c-1784115" wrote:
I wonder...is there a policy of how many pages we should fill with whineposts, that would at least get any CG response?
Like after 20 pages someone will say "all right all right we thought the design was good but haven't tested it properly". Or "the design was good we tested it properly and it's WAI and it won't get any better".
I mean right now I'm nearly ok with that it can't beat Revan.
What I don't really understand is how half of his leadership means completely nothing. You can just remove the part with crit avoidance and defense reduction and nothing changes in his usefullness.
Or the part that he's killing his team - even if we remove that, he still won't compete with revan properly.
So why add this skills and lower his usefuleness? That's what I whine about and don't understand. I don't care that I spent zetas and gear!! I care that he should be fun to play and he isn't!
Why do the rework and make him the same crap as before?? This is just a bad joke.
I do believe he should be able to reliably (at least 50/60% of the time) beat revan on offense, even without full 7 star characters. But the reason I quoted this post is because of this particular sentence that really resonates with me: "I care that he should be fun to play and he isn't! " This is the biggest sore point for me. Not only is it not a meta competitive team, It struggles even more against CLS and Traya and others. That is not fun, not being able to win is not fun. Again, this was a massive false advertisement play and needs to be addressed now. Don't just tease us with your next biggest thing (Malak or Revan or whatever) before you fix this horribly designed team.
50% is a coin flip, the exact opposite of reliable.
Better than... lets see, what is 1 divided by 26... 3.8%
