Forum Discussion
- SnuggeSnugglesRising NoviceAhsoka with a neutral tag, letting her be a carte blanche or wildcard to any faction requirement. :)
- SnuggeSnugglesRising NoviceI see her as being on the side of the individual underdogs with honor, that’s usually light side but not always. Some darksiders have honor and integrity, and given her history I think there could be arguments for her having grown into a “lawful neutral”.
- theXronoSeasoned Scout
"NicWester;c-2244723" wrote:
"flux_rono;c-2244471" wrote:
i dont think its super likely, BUT.....
i think since a good number of Separatist leaders were done already we could get General Kalani as a GL for them. somewhat similar to the TB version but changed around to fit a GL more.
The problem is that in order to be a Galactic Legend there probably shouldn't be a sizeable portion of the fanbase that reads the name and says, "Who?"
TBF people said Rey who for years and she is a GL ;)
but i know he wouldnt be likely at all, i was just thinknig of a seperatist that could work, PLUS his model is already in game - MomawNadonE3P0New Spectator
"NicWester;c-2244723" wrote:
The problem is that in order to be a Galactic Legend there probably shouldn't be a sizeable portion of the fanbase that reads the name and says, "Who?"
In fact exactly the opposite. People are forgetting that one of the primary motivations for the devs' choice will be profit-driven. A GL has to inspire a large portion of the playerbase to pursue it, enough so that they're hopefully inspired to spend money. So extreme widespread popularity has to be a major factor. Which pretty much restricts us to only half a dozen or so characters. - Grogu_4470Seasoned Novice
"E3P0;c-2244821" wrote:
"NicWester;c-2244723" wrote:
The problem is that in order to be a Galactic Legend there probably shouldn't be a sizeable portion of the fanbase that reads the name and says, "Who?"
In fact exactly the opposite. People are forgetting that one of the primary motivations for the devs' choice will be profit-driven. A GL has to inspire a large portion of the playerbase to pursue it, enough so that they're hopefully inspired to spend money. So extreme widespread popularity has to be a major factor. Which pretty much restricts us to only half a dozen or so characters.
You and NicWester are saying the same thing in different ways lol - I don’t see Disney’s intention of making their 3 movies the most important Star Wars content going away.
Next GL’s Ben Solo and Rey Skywalker. "E3P0;c-2244821" wrote:
"NicWester;c-2244723" wrote:
The problem is that in order to be a Galactic Legend there probably shouldn't be a sizeable portion of the fanbase that reads the name and says, "Who?"
In fact exactly the opposite. People are forgetting that one of the primary motivations for the devs' choice will be profit-driven. A GL has to inspire a large portion of the playerbase to pursue it, enough so that they're hopefully inspired to spend money. So extreme widespread popularity has to be a major factor. Which pretty much restricts us to only half a dozen or so characters.
I respectfully disagree. If the toons are OP, people will do what is necessary to obtain them.- I do pose this question though......What if we are done with Galactic Legends? Seems like CG has obtained pretty good competitive balance between the current four and logic would suggest that balance would be increasingly difficult to maintain with every additional GL.
"Pile;c-2244882" wrote:
I do pose this question though......What if we are done with Galactic Legends? Seems like CG has obtained pretty good competitive balance between the current four and logic would suggest that balance would be increasingly difficult to maintain with every additional GL.
I see GLs as the new "base roster", from here we are more likely to see power creep GLs, vs no more GLs. Everything is forever moving forward."Kyno;c-2244888" wrote:
"Pile;c-2244882" wrote:
I do pose this question though......What if we are done with Galactic Legends? Seems like CG has obtained pretty good competitive balance between the current four and logic would suggest that balance would be increasingly difficult to maintain with every additional GL.
I see GLs as the new "base roster", from here we are more likely to see power creep GLs, vs no more GLs. Everything is forever moving forward.
I wouldn't mind that at all. As more and more get all four of the current DLs, arena is getting way too top heavy for my taste.
About SWGOH General Discussion
Discuss and share your feedback on Star Wars: Galaxy of Heroes with fellow players.
77,688 PostsLatest Activity: 22 hours agoRelated Posts
Recent Discussions
- 47 minutes ago
- 4 hours ago
- 5 hours ago
- 5 hours ago