Next Content Update Preview - Part 1

"pay2win;70060" wrote:

"Fabzorz;70016" wrote:

"Naecabon;69824" wrote:

"pay2win;69819" wrote:
@Naecabon

That wasn't bashing Team Instinct. I'm trying to bring some sort of transparency to large alliance campaigning for changes that might benefit them.

I'm all ears as to how our for fun design of a system that benefits everyone, from F2P to the top P2P players, is a campaign for change specifically for us.

Maybe we just like the game and want to see it succeed?

This dude obviously has an agenda. Don't feed the trolls.

If you are talking about me, let me tell you my agenda. Large alliances tend to ruin games. They force their ideas of a game unto the entire community. You can see this with the silly half damage/raise HP for every characters idea. This doesn't fix the real problem. There are characters that are a lot better than their counterparts. Nerfing or buffing everyone will not change that fact.

If you don't see why big spenders having access to better gear and characters is a problem, I don't know what to tell you. This proposition will widen the gap between F2P, P2P, and P2W. This huge gap will become painfully obvious when you face this large alliance in any guild wars that involve PVP.