"Kane13;c-1083863" wrote:
"Roadburn12;c-1083822" wrote:
its not a bug so i dont see why they would nerf this combo.
If they are really not wanting this they will likely just buff the raid in some way similar to how they changed health immunity and gave it to the raid once it enrages. Alternately they can completely rework nute in a future separatist faction pass and make this strategy unusable but making nute better in the process
Uh you don't see why they would nerf this combo? Well let's see....you can use 3 bad toons with low level gear to solo a phase of the raid. A raid the devs made for the masses to spend money for gear and toons to be able to complete it. I'd guess 75% of guilds can't complete haat still but that will change quickly if they let this continue. Which would mean less money for EA...which is the only reason why EA makes games. For money. Cheers to Lugo for finding it but it needs to be nerfed.
Lets be honest here. The vast majority of EA's SWGOH income is from selling characters like Nihilus, Chirrut and Baze. All three of them have their uses in hAAT, but they're primarily Arena characters. No one's going to pay $1000 so their guild can complete hAAT. People will pay $1000 to have the best new character for Arena (Not me, personallly, but some people.)
AAT has been out for a long time. It took a lot less time for people to 'break' Rancor than it has to 'break' AAT. And pretty much every player who's complaining about this I wager has Heroic on farm already. They don't suffer - other people gain. There are plenty of other people with Heroic on farm who are bored by it - they see it as just a GK shard grind. So this doesn't really affect them - they don't give a toss about it either way.
Yes, I do have the characters necessary for this team. Of course I'm delighted that this team has been discovered. But even if I didn't have them already ready, I'd still be delighted. This is simply a fantastic use of game mechanics. Maybe it wasn't intended, but was Teebo intended? Was zKylo intended? Was Chirpatine intended? I think not.