Participation and raids

i don't think there is. you can tell them not to join, kick them if they still do.
I think cg's general policy is to never allow a leader/offcer to exclude players from participating in anything. It's rather abuse sensetive so i think it's a great policy.

They could add an optional feature that officers could decide to turn on/off.
The feature would boot guild members if they dont participate for more than 10 raids for example or if they are inactive for more than 1 month

"Chucko_marek;d-194400" wrote:
Is there a way to prohibit guild members who don't actively participate from joining raids and collecting their free stuff? A few friends were complaining about carrying a few members, but don't want to drop the boot and get rid of them. Personally I understand, coat tail riders need to be cut.

The dev team have stated that they will never give another player control over someone else ability to play the game, which is why even the "prohibited" actions can be ignored.

Leadership needs to make the rules and the hard decisions. If they are not doing their part to help the guild grow, why not give them the boot and find someone who will.

Does your guild complete the raids fairly quickly, or do you struggle to get them done?

"ZFinnForTheWin;c-1765884" wrote:
Does your guild complete the raids fairly quickly, or do you struggle to get them done?

Not my guild, friends from an old guild. They struggle with Sith raid, TW and TB because of participation. Haat is not a problem and of course Hpit is a bit of a joke.

"leef;c-1765888" wrote:
i don't think there is. you can tell them not to join, kick them if they still do.
I think cg's general policy is to never allow a leader/offcer to exclude players from participating in anything. It's rather abuse sensetive so i think it's a great policy.

Booting people from the guild is about as "abusive" as you can get, But outside of that there should be some kind of "time out" for poor behavior.

Boot and replace versus attempting to restrict their game play by guild driven penalties

"Austin9370;c-1765899" wrote:
Boot and replace versus attempting to restrict their game play by guild driven penalties

I agree that is the only option, but my pals wanted to be fair. Such Jedi >:)

"Chucko_marek;c-1765898" wrote:

"leef;c-1765888" wrote:
i don't think there is. you can tell them not to join, kick them if they still do.
I think cg's general policy is to never allow a leader/offcer to exclude players from participating in anything. It's rather abuse sensetive so i think it's a great policy.

Booting people from the guild is about as "abusive" as you can get, But outside of that there should be some kind of "time out" for poor behavior.

It's not restricting gameplay because they can just join another guild. Giving leaders/officers tools to restrict gameplay is not the same as giving them the ability to boot players.
I've been long enough on the forum to see quite a few players who stuck with their guild eventhough it had terrible tyranic leadership.

We only have 3 requirements in our guild that can and will get you booted. 600, 100% TB participation and daily discord communication. Since all 3 raids are on farm, we suggest members at least log a 0 in each. Anything that affects the guild as a whole is required participation, so in your case HSTR participation would be a requirement also. 3 strikes and they're out. Sounds harsh but you have to let the guild know you're serious about protecting the active members.