Platoon Requirements

Well I guess that response says it all.
Not even like you can purposefully acquire any of these rare ships unless you gamble on the ship packs and hope for a shard or two.

And there are like 12 people in the entire community who have them, they can start charging money to switch guilds :open_mouth:

Our platoons have been pao and baze heavy, yeah pretty similar for both top and bottom requirements
*after reading some other posts. Our individual platoon requirements are different, but the top and bottom platoons are identical.

Yeah I dont feel bad about our 14 paos for today's requirement, thanks guys!

"CG_Kozispoon;c-1266872" wrote:
Hiya!
This does not appear to be a bug. Recruit Players to your Guild that have these Characters in their roster, or you can acquire them on your own.

@CG_Kozispoon
It may not technically be a bug, but it is also not random. The platoon requirements were identical today across both territories for 6 platoons for us. We had 26 Bistan's needed today. 3 in one platoon alone (duplicated in another platoon naturally). This is doable at 3 and 4*s. But going forward, that's untenable. That's not WAI from how you and @CG_RyDiggs have described the platoon system. We still haven't heard from the Dev team regarding Phoenix and Rogue 1 popping up in platoons in the same phase they're required. If we get to phase 5 and need 26 Ezra's alone... that kind of breaks the TB for all of us. And yeah... ships platoons. Please make the ships you have in platoons farmable in some real way.

Hiya!
This has been flagged as a bug and sent up to our team for further review. Thanks!

"Liath;c-1266808" wrote:

"StarSon;c-1266805" wrote:

"Macattack9;c-1266788" wrote:
20 Wedges for us...

"Stenun;c-1266801" wrote:
We need 4 Han Solos.
We've never even summoned Tier VII Rancor yet and now we need 4 copies of the characters whose shards are exclusive to it.

Not to mention 20 Landos, 14 Leias and 14 Lobots, and 12 Scariff Pathfinders. *lol*

Both unfortunate circumstances but well off topic for the thread.

Only the need for Han Solos is off topic. The 20 Wedges/Landos is a function of the platoons repeating themselves, which is exactly the topic of the thread.

Han solo comment is on topic.

Their guild requires 4 of them. The issue they are having is that they havent done a single hpit so how could they fill tbis requirement. Would a guild not doing HAAT have a fair shot if they got even 1 gk in a platoon? There would be more guilds upset about that because more are unsuccessful at that high end raid.

The main point is that platoons are bugged and identical platoons are not WAI because the odds of that happening on multiple occasions are microscopic.

No worries, @Indominable_J lemme wrangle @CG_RyDiggs to see what we can see!

"Molelizaisajoke;c-1266949" wrote:

"Liath;c-1266808" wrote:

"StarSon;c-1266805" wrote:

"Macattack9;c-1266788" wrote:
20 Wedges for us...

"Stenun;c-1266801" wrote:
We need 4 Han Solos.
We've never even summoned Tier VII Rancor yet and now we need 4 copies of the characters whose shards are exclusive to it.

Not to mention 20 Landos, 14 Leias and 14 Lobots, and 12 Scariff Pathfinders. *lol*

Both unfortunate circumstances but well off topic for the thread.

Only the need for Han Solos is off topic. The 20 Wedges/Landos is a function of the platoons repeating themselves, which is exactly the topic of the thread.

Han solo comment is on topic.

Their guild requires 4 of them. The issue they are having is that they havent done a single hpit so how could they fill tbis requirement. Would a guild not doing HAAT have a fair shot if they got even 1 gk in a platoon? There would be more guilds upset about that because more are unsuccessful at that high end raid.

The main point is that platoons are bugged and identical platoons are not WAI because the odds of that happening on multiple occasions are microscopic.

I'm not saying it's not a relevant topic, I'm saying it's not this topic. The complaint there is that nobody in the guild has Raid Han because they don't do heroic raids. That would be an issue for them whether there was 1 Raid Han or 20. It's not about the platoons being identical, which is what this thread is about.

Thanks Kozi

"Indominable_J;c-1266889" wrote:
Can we get some sort of communication on whether or not a resolution has been reached?

"CG_RyDiggs;c-1252420" wrote:
Copied from my edit to OP:

DEVELOPER POST: @CG_RyDiggs
Hello everyone,
We're seeing another record day of participation in the new Territory Battles! Our office is also on a US holiday weekend.
I want to let you know we are collecting feedback.
We are listening.
We will not be able to make changes to THIS TB.
This is a living game, and we all will continue to grow and improve on it.
Some of newer players may not understand the 'living' nature of our game, but please know that not every piece of feedback needs to be an ultimatum for us to listen or change.
I see the requirements feedback. We will be reviewing it in the coming weeks.
There is no way for it to change in this TB.
I cannot say what future TBs will be.
However, please rest assured, you are being heard.
We hope you're able to enjoy the parts you can and let us know where improvements can be made without emotional stress.
Please try to enjoy your weekends as well, and know we're all in this together.
Cheers!
@CG_RyDiggs

Hello @Indominable_J,

Please re-read my post line by line, as I tried to convey that we are reading, we are reviewing, if/when any changes are made, we will be announcing. This is fairly standard, but sometimes I find that us acknowledging that fact helps player's with expectations.

ANY new game changes will be announced through the normal means through our UPDATE and News & Announcment methods. Thus this message is dead.
That said, I'll post this again but won't be replying as all of the information available on the topic is here and unchanged.

1. We are listening.
* Self explanatory. I'm just confirming what you know (evidenced by me repying ;) )

2. We will not be able to make changes to THIS TB.
* Pretty clear setting of expectation there.

3. This is a living game, and we all will continue to grow and improve on it.
4. Some of newer players may not understand the 'living' nature of our game, but please know that not every piece of feedback needs to be an ultimatum for us to listen or change.
* Reminder that we're constantly updating and changing aspects of the game to improve and enhance it.

5. I see the requirements feedback. We will be reviewing it in the coming weeks.
* Confirmation that we will review feedback. If or when we take action is not committed. ONLY that we do read and review feedback.

6. There is no way for it to change in this TB.
* Again, setting expectation for current TB. Explicitly saying we are not committing to anything.

7. I cannot say what future TBs will be.
* Most Important: Not committing to any future changes of TBs.


Again, I thank you VERY much for your support and dedication to the game. We'll continue working to match the passion and engagement of our players!

Cheers, and Fight On!

RyDiggs