"Waqui;c-2152167" wrote:
"DarjeloSalas;c-2152149" wrote:
"Waqui;c-2152147" wrote:
"DarjeloSalas;c-2152141" wrote:
TVF didn’t say it helped you score more than you could.
I know. But his reply to my question didn't answer the question. I'm sure he must have had a point with his reply (he always does with his posts) but it made no sense as a reply to my question.
"DarjeloSalas;c-2152141" wrote:
Scoring your highest possible score involves risk, and the advantage that going last provides - if it ever does provide an advantage - is knowing how much risk you need to or don’t need to take.
So, you agree knowing your opponent's score doesn't actually help you score higher than you max possible without knowing the score?
See my follow up post.
Looks like we agree then :-). Knowing your opponent's score doesn't help you win the round but it could help you to a less stressfull offense, where you can slack, maybe do feats (for less banners) and still win the round.
You didn't actually read his post did you? Or at least, if you did, you intentionally misinterpreted it to fit your narrative.
Knowing your opponents score can help you win the round. It gives you a better idea where to adjust risk v. reward - and if your opponent scored lower (and you know this in advance) you can slide away from the risk side of the equation. If you did not know your opponent's score in advance, and instead went after your "maximum" score, with high risk attacks, you could lose more easily if things go bad for you in one of those battles.
If you still insist that knowing your opponent's score in advance can't help you win the match after it now being explained in multiple ways, by multiple people, I can only presume you are posting in this thread then...https://i.imgur.com/05TDC9H.gif