Raid reward comparison based on data
I've done research of old raids data based on example I've founded. There is some rules of this research: CPit not included. Example to show what was lost for guilds who finished only HSTR. ...
Forum Discussion
Your calculation methodology for HSTR rewards massively overestimates how much guilds got on average from that raid. The min for HSTR is much less then .7 of 1st place rewards, and you’re averaging the rewards as though half the guild gets the max and half the min. The distribution is essentially .2 get close to the max and .8 get close to an even lower min.
I think a lot of why people feel Krayt is bad deal is because most of calculations for the old raid rewards assume that most people got top 10 HSTR rewards every raid, when that’s fairly obviously not how it works
I think a lot of why people feel Krayt is bad deal is because most of calculations for the old raid rewards assume that most people got top 10 HSTR rewards every raid, when that’s fairly obviously not how it works
"DeusArt;c-2421752" wrote:"Intimmydation;c-2421747" wrote:
TLDR
- For players consistently getting Top 10 in hstr, it is an overall loss in rewards, but get over it.
- For the average player ~rank 20 in raids, it's basically break-even now at the 25M box in Krayt, slight loss on GET1/2, SSC, but benefits of new currency outweigh this
- For high end guilds going up the Krayt milestones, the added access to high relic mats via Mk3 is huge
- For EVERY low level guild, this is a HUGE win because getting milestone 2 (17M) will be a HUGE upgrade than what they could get before, especially if they were nowhere close to CPIT completion.
Grea but numbers shows losing rewards for all categories. From 14-40% based on raid place and without counting CPit.
