I know there have been many debates, many examples of who is what, when and why, but the fact is Asajj was once and should now be, labeled a Sith I'm SWGOH. Especially if Darth Maul can defect and just name his brother a Sith apprentice and declare himself a Sith Master. It would open her up to more teams and she'd see much more play, especially with her rework. Any and all comments welcomed, but try to keep it to support of this idea, any Dev comments would be great too as to why she is not but others are when they technically shouldn't be, etc. Cuz if we're gona get technical for her, then we should for everyone, but making her Sith just seems right and would make alot more players happy vs not happy, much more.@CG_Kozispoon @CG_CapGaSP @the team behind char dev/designationsThx :)

I don't think so, she was trained by Dookan and he was the apprentice of palp, and the rule of two of darth bane implies that neither Asajj nor savage were sith, because of that. She was a nightsister with strong relations with the force, not a sith, in my opinion.

And that is why I brought up Savage, he is labeled a Sith ...I just want it fair if we're gona be technical, and a comment from the Devs as to why she is not

She was a dark force user but not a Sith, just like the Inquisitors. She was Dooku's assassin, just like the Inquisitors were Vader's.

Savage was being trained as a Sith apprentice with Maul as his masterDooku had plans of training Ventress as a suth apprentice but sidious stopped him before he did

They made Savage Opress a sith so I think asajj should be it too. Asajj is more sith than Opress if anyone of them should be it.

Regardless of current standing, Asajj was once and should now be, Sith!

MasterMasterTL
8 years ago
I don't think so, she was trained by Dookan and he was the apprentice of palp, and the rule of two of darth bane implies that neither Asajj nor savage were sith, because of that. She was a nightsister with strong relations with the force, not a sith, in my opinion.
Eviljacket
8 years ago
And that is why I brought up Savage, he is labeled a Sith ...I just want it fair if we're gona be technical, and a comment from the Devs as to why she is not
totenteufel
8 years ago
She was a dark force user but not a Sith, just like the Inquisitors. She was Dooku's assassin, just like the Inquisitors were Vader's.
Xx7MeLo7xX
8 years ago
Savage was being trained as a Sith
apprentice with Maul as his master

Dooku had plans of training Ventress as a suth apprentice but sidious stopped him before he did
JStenholt97
8 years ago
They made Savage Opress a sith so I think asajj should be it too.
Asajj is more sith than Opress if anyone of them should be it.
unit900000
8 years ago
Ventress is not a sith savage is. Let's stick with the lore please enough with this non sense.
superEwokCat
8 years ago
"hnewton;818307" wrote:
Savage was being trained as a Sith
apprentice with Maul as his master

Dooku had plans of training Ventress as a suth apprentice but sidious stopped him before he did

^This just beats this v
"Gamorrean;818316" wrote:
They made Savage Opress a sith so I think asajj should be it too.
Asajj is more sith than Opress if anyone of them should be it.
Geonosian_Spy
8 years ago
Sorry but Asaji's designated faction is the least of this sorry toon's worries. I'm hard-pressed to think this matter is something the devs are going to fast-track. I didn't think people even used AV in this game; I've never once encountered anyone using her in Arena and when I see her on the opposing side in GW it's like having a 5-vs-4.

"GrimmVonHell;84000" wrote:
I know there have been many debates, many examples of who is what, when and why, but the fact is Asajj was once and should now be, labeled a Sith I'm SWGOH. Especially if Darth Maul can defect and just name his brother a Sith apprentice and declare himself a Sith Master. It would open her up to more teams and she'd see much more play, especially with her rework.

Any and all comments welcomed, but try to keep it to support of this idea, any Dev comments would be great too as to why she is not but others are when they technically shouldn't be, etc. Cuz if we're gona get technical for her, then we should for everyone, but making her Sith just seems right and would make alot more players happy vs not happy, much more.

@CG_Kozispoon
@CG_CapGaSP
@the team behind char dev/designations

Thx :)
Tamat1NZ
8 years ago
It says on Ventresses wookiepedia page that she was a Sith appretice.
On Savages wookiepedia page it also says that he was a Sith apprentice
Based on that information, it makes zero sense that Ventress doesn't have the Sith tag while Savage does, especially given that the version of Ventress we have is the version prior to Dooku's betrayal.

The only dark side force user in this game currently who shouldn't have the Sith tag is Kylo Ren, simply because he isn't a Sith, he's the master of the Knights of Ren. Besides I'm sure he will get something sooner or later, but Ventress needs the Sith tag.
vector6000
8 years ago
None of this expanded universe and cartoon stuff is canon anyway.
Give it a rest. Ventress is not a Sith. You can only be a Sith by being one of the officially designated "two" (Master and Apprentice).

For example, Dooku only became Sith when Maul died. He was a dark force user before, but no sith. He became a Sith once being officially named Darth Tyranus.

And of course after the death of Vader and Sidious the siths were eradicated.