Replay malak event. It gives shards [MERGE]

"JZ95;c-1983968" wrote:

"Lysandrax;c-1983959" wrote:

"JZ95;c-1983955" wrote:

"Lysandrax;c-1983945" wrote:

"JZ95;c-1983935" wrote:

"evoluza;c-1983932" wrote:

"JZ95;c-1983928" wrote:

"evoluza;c-1983927" wrote:
They could ban some people.
Have fun in fear till they comment on it

I'm not afraid, there's no way they ban anyone, it's not player's fault

It's an obvious bug...
You took advantage of it and that is always an banable offense

How is it an obvious bug? Please explain. This event is one of a kind it's not a legendary, as far as I'm concerned it can give 150 shards whenever it returns, there's no precedence so everything is on the table.

You've posted in a few threads so hopefully this clears things up.
Thats not how it works.
This event isn't supposed to award shards upon return for those who have already completed it, so yes this is wrong.
There is no question about this, the event is wrong, or CG is attempting to mitigate the GAS concerns held by the playerbase.

Let's do it mathematically and take a probablistic approach. Say you don't read the forums or Reddit, after all a player should not be obligated to do so just to play the game.

So if we look at the amount of events that gave shards twice there are none, however this event is the first of it's kind, actually the second but GAS has only made one appearance. This means there's no sample size, you have to compare it to legendaries. So yes it's unlikely that they would just give shards all over again, but this is the first event of it's kind. Similarly, how many times has a bug taken place that's given improper rewards? Well it never has, so it's more probable that it was intentional for this type of event. Maybe not by much but definitely more probable.

Just calm down there fulla, this is the third coming of this event, thw second one didnt award shards and that was 100% intentional.
I dont need a sample size for anything here.
This 3rd event awarding shards depreciates the value of all shards bought with GET currency. There is no debate there. The only conversation we can have after that is that metas always change and that 57GET now isn't worth the same as 57GET then in respect to the crystal value yielded by the character bought through said currency.

For those of us who were locked out of the first event, the second time was our first time. Therefore we couldn't have possibly known if the event rewarded shards or not.

Remember this is a game that underage people play, people who don't even have access to in game chat.

If you don't know something, then you cant then proceed to present things with certainty, which is exactly what yoy have done.
You can either walk back your claims of 'no sample size' and 'reasource management' about events you aren't farmiliar with or you can double down and keep telling your tall tales