Replay malak event. It gives shards [MERGE]

"evoluza;c-1983964" wrote:

"JDIII;c-1983958" wrote:
Playing a mission isn’t a an offense that can get banned. Hacking/using cheat codes will

Read the ToS...
Exploiting bugs can get you banned.
This is a bug.
The OP did the second mission after knowing about the extra shards that never happened before... to get Malak to 7*.

Who says its a bug?
There is no set cadence for epic confrontations.
No one will be banned for this, I'd put 100 vaults on it.
This could far more likely be an attempt by CG to help stop people take issue with GAS shards being in the GET1 store

I can’t even think that this is intentional. Actually, tons of people that did not have malak 7* can now stack GET1 to 7* GAS when it returns. It’s not really cool for those who get GAS right now and they can’t use it in arena because 5* is not even able to kill DR malak. Now, all malak 5 or 6* going instantly to 7* will just place sith empire team for the top 500 until the next new meta or the next 7* GAS. The problem is that it will happen at the same time when the event comeback. I’m sure they will fix it....

"evoluza;c-1983964" wrote:

"JDIII;c-1983958" wrote:
Playing a mission isn’t a an offense that can get banned. Hacking/using cheat codes will

Read the ToS...
Exploiting bugs can get you banned.
This is a bug.
The OP did the second mission after knowing about the extra shards that never happened before... to get Malak to 7*.

They are not going to ban all the people that replayed both parts because they can probably close the doors the minute after that.

Better start thinking about those GET refunds instead of removing a considerable percent of the player base.

"JZ95;c-1983968" wrote:

"Lysandrax;c-1983959" wrote:

"JZ95;c-1983955" wrote:

"Lysandrax;c-1983945" wrote:

"JZ95;c-1983935" wrote:

"evoluza;c-1983932" wrote:

"JZ95;c-1983928" wrote:

"evoluza;c-1983927" wrote:
They could ban some people.
Have fun in fear till they comment on it

I'm not afraid, there's no way they ban anyone, it's not player's fault

It's an obvious bug...
You took advantage of it and that is always an banable offense

How is it an obvious bug? Please explain. This event is one of a kind it's not a legendary, as far as I'm concerned it can give 150 shards whenever it returns, there's no precedence so everything is on the table.

You've posted in a few threads so hopefully this clears things up.
Thats not how it works.
This event isn't supposed to award shards upon return for those who have already completed it, so yes this is wrong.
There is no question about this, the event is wrong, or CG is attempting to mitigate the GAS concerns held by the playerbase.

Let's do it mathematically and take a probablistic approach. Say you don't read the forums or Reddit, after all a player should not be obligated to do so just to play the game.

So if we look at the amount of events that gave shards twice there are none, however this event is the first of it's kind, actually the second but GAS has only made one appearance. This means there's no sample size, you have to compare it to legendaries. So yes it's unlikely that they would just give shards all over again, but this is the first event of it's kind. Similarly, how many times has a bug taken place that's given improper rewards? Well it never has, so it's more probable that it was intentional for this type of event. Maybe not by much but definitely more probable.

Just calm down there fulla, this is the third coming of this event, thw second one didnt award shards and that was 100% intentional.
I dont need a sample size for anything here.
This 3rd event awarding shards depreciates the value of all shards bought with GET currency. There is no debate there. The only conversation we can have after that is that metas always change and that 57GET now isn't worth the same as 57GET then in respect to the crystal value yielded by the character bought through said currency.

For those of us who were locked out of the first event, the second time was our first time. Therefore we couldn't have possibly known if the event rewarded shards or not.

Remember this is a game that underage people play, people who don't even have access to in game chat.

If you don't know something, then you cant then proceed to present things with certainty, which is exactly what yoy have done.
You can either walk back your claims of 'no sample size' and 'reasource management' about events you aren't farmiliar with or you can double down and keep telling your tall tales

I was too lazy to do the maths, I’ve obviously just copied someone else who was wrong as well ?

"ChedlinkCheese;c-1983977" wrote:
180 shards * 380 GET = 68,400. Why is this 57k comment all over the place?

It's not like the event gives shards everytime you beat Malak and he exploited it to get a million shard store currency. THAT would be an obvious bug.
This is CG's problem, they have to compensate earlier unlockers.
Otherwise they would probably have to ban most of their playerbase and I'm sure as hell they absolutely can't afford that.

"evoluza;c-1983978" wrote:

"RandomSithLord;c-1983974" wrote:

"evoluza;c-1983964" wrote:

"JDIII;c-1983958" wrote:
Playing a mission isn’t a an offense that can get banned. Hacking/using cheat codes will

Read the ToS...
Exploiting bugs can get you banned.
This is a bug.
The OP did the second mission after knowing about the extra shards that never happened before... to get Malak to 7*.

They are not going to ban all the people that replayed both parts because they can probably close the doors the minute after that.

Better start thinking about those GET refunds instead of removing a considerable percent of the player base.

I am not saying they should, only that they could.
I take get1 compensation all day

I think 'could' is not a possibility at this point, unless they do it selectively. Several players that account for a good portion of their monthly budget have already replayed it just for the shard currency. That's what I meant by closing the doors.

Because 150 shards you can GET this event = 57k ;)

Yeah.... give us the 57k GET1 back!

"JZ95;c-1983986" wrote:

"Lysandrax;c-1983979" wrote:

"JZ95;c-1983968" wrote:

"Lysandrax;c-1983959" wrote:

"JZ95;c-1983955" wrote:

"Lysandrax;c-1983945" wrote:

"JZ95;c-1983935" wrote:

"evoluza;c-1983932" wrote:

"JZ95;c-1983928" wrote:

"evoluza;c-1983927" wrote:
They could ban some people.
Have fun in fear till they comment on it

I'm not afraid, there's no way they ban anyone, it's not player's fault

It's an obvious bug...
You took advantage of it and that is always an banable offense

How is it an obvious bug? Please explain. This event is one of a kind it's not a legendary, as far as I'm concerned it can give 150 shards whenever it returns, there's no precedence so everything is on the table.

You've posted in a few threads so hopefully this clears things up.
Thats not how it works.
This event isn't supposed to award shards upon return for those who have already completed it, so yes this is wrong.
There is no question about this, the event is wrong, or CG is attempting to mitigate the GAS concerns held by the playerbase.

Let's do it mathematically and take a probablistic approach. Say you don't read the forums or Reddit, after all a player should not be obligated to do so just to play the game.

So if we look at the amount of events that gave shards twice there are none, however this event is the first of it's kind, actually the second but GAS has only made one appearance. This means there's no sample size, you have to compare it to legendaries. So yes it's unlikely that they would just give shards all over again, but this is the first event of it's kind. Similarly, how many times has a bug taken place that's given improper rewards? Well it never has, so it's more probable that it was intentional for this type of event. Maybe not by much but definitely more probable.

Just calm down there fulla, this is the third coming of this event, thw second one didnt award shards and that was 100% intentional.
I dont need a sample size for anything here.
This 3rd event awarding shards depreciates the value of all shards bought with GET currency. There is no debate there. The only conversation we can have after that is that metas always change and that 57GET now isn't worth the same as 57GET then in respect to the crystal value yielded by the character bought through said currency.

For those of us who were locked out of the first event, the second time was our first time. Therefore we couldn't have possibly known if the event rewarded shards or not.

Remember this is a game that underage people play, people who don't even have access to in game chat.

If you don't know something, then you cant then proceed to present things with certainty, which is exactly what yoy have done.
You can either walk back your claims of 'no sample size' and 'reasource management' about events you aren't farmiliar with or you can double down and keep telling your tall tales

The resource management comments on are clearly sarcastic, with how often the term is thrown around here to shut people down, I couldn't resist but to say it.

If you don't know something, it means your innocent and you don't deserve a ban.

Tripling down and playing ignorant i see. Ok.