"Intrapidoo;c-1783678" wrote:
"Denizen_Kain;c-1783674" wrote:
Though i do agree with the false advertising on this rework, whole heartedly in fact, bashing the developers is not constructive and unless they issue a response that ignores or deflects the obvious issue with the product they delivered not matching what was advertised, the personal attacks simply are not warranted.
Crumbs just posted that the issue with gg is non existent and we dont know how to mod him. So that validates every attack on them.
In my post i posted screenshots of my GGs health and mods, to counter CGs arugument. Let’s see what they say about that before resorting to name calling and insults.
