Forum Discussion
174 Replies
Sort By
"BobaFettish86;c-2308462" wrote:
"StewartH;c-2308370" wrote:
"BobaFettish86;c-2308198" wrote:
"Tuareg111;c-2308137" wrote:
"BobaFettish86;c-2308135" wrote:
"SemiGod;c-2308117" wrote:
"SWBSD;c-2308111" wrote:
Even though I’m not the biggest of Boba Fett fans, I think if The Book of Boba Fett is going to be as big as the hype, it’d be a shame if CG didn’t make him the next (and 1st neutral) GL.
Boba GL? ?
Rather have GL Snoke, at least he had something going for him before being turned utterly useless and tossed away in the movie.
Not every legendary character in the Star Wars universe ran around with a lightsaber. I would actually like to see some variety in GLs rather than a different shade of the same dull grey.
Well snoke hadn’t a lightsaber. He could be a great FO Support Leader like MM.
No he didn't. He also didn't do anything. So not sure what abilities you think he'll bring to the table...
Snoke is the one that led Kylo to the darkside and introduced him to the Knights Of Ren which ultimately led to him taking over as their leader and falling to the darkside. Snoke also trained Kylo.
This game has plenty of characters that did much more than the movies show and Snoke is another one.
GL? Maybe not, but without Snoke there is no Kylo Ren. Similar to without Palp there is no Vader.
Snoke was a sock puppet for Palpatine. And that's all he was.
So if Snoke = Palpatine then we should get a Snoke GL because then we will have a version of Palpatine that doesn’t suck in game.
Or at least one that can actually be viable against modern gls- dogwelder794 years agoSeasoned AceI'd rather have Jar-jar than Snoke.
"dogwelder79;c-2308491" wrote:
I'd rather have Jar-jar than Snoke.
Blame top hat for no jar jar"Kyno;c-2308054" wrote:
"ShaggyB;c-2308002" wrote:
"Ultra;c-2307985" wrote:
Content update is on Wednesday (October 27th), we’ve known this since October 6th via datamine
Even if they did RA this week, it wouldn’t change the gear economy changes on the 27th
Why dont they just say sorry its coming on 27th then?
If the release of the content is known, the post about it should be easy to deliver
They did post about it, that's how we know its coming. They are not doing anything wrong, there is no need to apologize.
Where did they say it was coming on X date?
Regardless, this is just like when some one says "now under $10" and you see $9.99..... its the optics that is in question, not the reality.
Delivering a road ahead in october but waiting till the last day is not a good look. Sure its still october on the 27th at closing time.... but is it what the expectation truely is?"ShaggyB;c-2308538" wrote:
"Kyno;c-2308054" wrote:
"ShaggyB;c-2308002" wrote:
"Ultra;c-2307985" wrote:
Content update is on Wednesday (October 27th), we’ve known this since October 6th via datamine
Even if they did RA this week, it wouldn’t change the gear economy changes on the 27th
Why dont they just say sorry its coming on 27th then?
If the release of the content is known, the post about it should be easy to deliver
They did post about it, that's how we know its coming. They are not doing anything wrong, there is no need to apologize.
Where did they say it was coming on X date?
Regardless, this is just like when some one says "now under $10" and you see $9.99..... its the optics that is in question, not the reality.
Delivering a road ahead in october but waiting till the last day is not a good look. Sure its still october on the 27th at closing time.... but is it what the expectation truely is?
Yes. They have a setup that is always followed, 1 week is a server side update the other is client side, they alternate.
They said it's coming in October, it will. It didnt come in the previous client side update, so it should come in the next.
Many updates come in the last week of the month, when they fall there. This is an important one from the player perspective, I get that, but it is also, just a normal update that will follow the system they have been doing.
No it is not a slight towards the player base.- DrStewartH4 years agoRising Vanguard
"BobaFettish86;c-2308462" wrote:
"StewartH;c-2308370" wrote:
"BobaFettish86;c-2308198" wrote:
"Tuareg111;c-2308137" wrote:
"BobaFettish86;c-2308135" wrote:
"SemiGod;c-2308117" wrote:
"SWBSD;c-2308111" wrote:
Even though I’m not the biggest of Boba Fett fans, I think if The Book of Boba Fett is going to be as big as the hype, it’d be a shame if CG didn’t make him the next (and 1st neutral) GL.
Boba GL? ?
Rather have GL Snoke, at least he had something going for him before being turned utterly useless and tossed away in the movie.
Not every legendary character in the Star Wars universe ran around with a lightsaber. I would actually like to see some variety in GLs rather than a different shade of the same dull grey.
Well snoke hadn’t a lightsaber. He could be a great FO Support Leader like MM.
No he didn't. He also didn't do anything. So not sure what abilities you think he'll bring to the table...
Snoke is the one that led Kylo to the darkside and introduced him to the Knights Of Ren which ultimately led to him taking over as their leader and falling to the darkside. Snoke also trained Kylo.
This game has plenty of characters that did much more than the movies show and Snoke is another one.
GL? Maybe not, but without Snoke there is no Kylo Ren. Similar to without Palp there is no Vader.
Snoke was a sock puppet for Palpatine. And that's all he was.
Nah, theres much more to the story than just those 2 movies you watched. "Kyno;c-2308592" wrote:
"ShaggyB;c-2308538" wrote:
"Kyno;c-2308054" wrote:
"ShaggyB;c-2308002" wrote:
"Ultra;c-2307985" wrote:
Content update is on Wednesday (October 27th), we’ve known this since October 6th via datamine
Even if they did RA this week, it wouldn’t change the gear economy changes on the 27th
Why dont they just say sorry its coming on 27th then?
If the release of the content is known, the post about it should be easy to deliver
They did post about it, that's how we know its coming. They are not doing anything wrong, there is no need to apologize.
Where did they say it was coming on X date?
Regardless, this is just like when some one says "now under $10" and you see $9.99..... its the optics that is in question, not the reality.
Delivering a road ahead in october but waiting till the last day is not a good look. Sure its still october on the 27th at closing time.... but is it what the expectation truely is?
Yes. They have a setup that is always followed, 1 week is a server side update the other is client side, they alternate.
They said it's coming in October, it will. It didnt come in the previous client side update, so it should come in the next.
Many updates come in the last week of the month, when they fall there. This is an important one from the player perspective, I get that, but it is also, just a normal update that will follow the system they have been doing.
No it is not a slight towards the player base.
Not saying its a slight, saying it has poor optics.
I also feel RA post and gear update are two seperate things... and the post should never come last day or week of the month. At the latest that should be a mid month thing.
Update can labd whenever its ready, though the optics of stating gear economy changes and then doing them after releasing relic 9 and relic 9 paid packs is not good.
Should have been reversed.- eleslalegenda4 years agoNew AceLooks like we're getting the road ahead today
"ShaggyB;c-2308613" wrote:
"Kyno;c-2308592" wrote:
"ShaggyB;c-2308538" wrote:
"Kyno;c-2308054" wrote:
"ShaggyB;c-2308002" wrote:
"Ultra;c-2307985" wrote:
Content update is on Wednesday (October 27th), we’ve known this since October 6th via datamine
Even if they did RA this week, it wouldn’t change the gear economy changes on the 27th
Why dont they just say sorry its coming on 27th then?
If the release of the content is known, the post about it should be easy to deliver
They did post about it, that's how we know its coming. They are not doing anything wrong, there is no need to apologize.
Where did they say it was coming on X date?
Regardless, this is just like when some one says "now under $10" and you see $9.99..... its the optics that is in question, not the reality.
Delivering a road ahead in october but waiting till the last day is not a good look. Sure its still october on the 27th at closing time.... but is it what the expectation truely is?
Yes. They have a setup that is always followed, 1 week is a server side update the other is client side, they alternate.
They said it's coming in October, it will. It didnt come in the previous client side update, so it should come in the next.
Many updates come in the last week of the month, when they fall there. This is an important one from the player perspective, I get that, but it is also, just a normal update that will follow the system they have been doing.
No it is not a slight towards the player base.
Not saying its a slight, saying it has poor optics.
I also feel RA post and gear update are two seperate things... and the post should never come last day or week of the month. At the latest that should be a mid month thing.
Update can labd whenever its ready, though the optics of stating gear economy changes and then doing them after releasing relic 9 and relic 9 paid packs is not good.
Should have been reversed.
We can all feel how we want about the 2, but they are connected. When they come is related to that, and when in the month it comes is of very little consequence.
Reversing them would have been worse or the same, all the good would be wiped out if that was the case, or at best been a wash.
R9 release is part of a larger timeline and the economy changes are not.
About SWGOH General Discussion
Discuss and share your feedback on Star Wars: Galaxy of Heroes with fellow players.79,773 PostsLatest Activity: 2 hours ago
Recent Discussions
- 59 minutes ago
- 2 hours ago
- 4 hours ago
- 5 hours ago