ROLO Shards 1 vs. 2?
Was there an announcement that the ROLO special battle would only yield 1 shard per person instead of 2?
Forum Discussion
"Woodroward;c-1865552" wrote:"jkray622;c-1839402" wrote:
The number of shards was increased from 1 to 2 when Dark Side Territory battles were launched, because the number of Light Side TBs was effectively cut in half.
Actually it was increased from 1 to 2 to make up for tb's initial plan of 12 hour phases. There was actually many threads asking for it to be increased again to 4 shards when dark side tb came out.
"Woodroward;c-1865723" wrote:"Lor_San_Teka;c-1865566" wrote:"Woodroward;c-1865552" wrote:"jkray622;c-1839402" wrote:
The number of shards was increased from 1 to 2 when Dark Side Territory battles were launched, because the number of Light Side TBs was effectively cut in half.
Actually it was increased from 1 to 2 to make up for tb's initial plan of 12 hour phases. There was actually many threads asking for it to be increased again to 4 shards when dark side tb came out.
This is demonstrably false. It helps no one when people blatantly spread misinformation like this.
https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/157422/content-update-2-7-2018
This is when shards were updated from 2 to 1. TB had been active for 6+ months, DSTB was introduced 2 months prior to this, in 11/17. The explanation for this was explicitly that it was due to LSTBs being cut in half with the introduction of DSTB, so both events would give double shards.
I stand corrected.
It's not blatantly spread misinformation though as you claim. Everything i stated is true except that I had the complaint and the reason backwards.
Your response was way too vehement to be justified by my slight misorder of information.
You made two statements. One was demonstrably false. The other might be true - players might have asked for it to go to 4 - but it's irrelevant to the conversation because it had nothing to do with why the shards were increased to 2/TB.
So no, everything you said is NOT true. In fact, your claiming fake information to be true is literally an example of "spreading misinformation."
There's no "misorder" in your statement, there is only "misinformation" that you still haven't bothered to retract.
