Shame. Just Shame.

"MaruMaru;c-2221290" wrote:

"Schwartzring;c-2221225" wrote:

"MaruMaru;c-2220951" wrote:

You should know what method they are using then, it's the active gp of the guilds and nothing else. It doesn't compare any quantity and quality of the other things. Not too different from how gac matchmaking works.

When did that change because its not what the devs stated in the past?

Active GP is for Rewards tier only.

Matchmaking uses some algorithm they wouldn't clarify but involved power of the most common upper tier teams or some such thing per the dev post below

https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/162893/dev-post-matchmaking-clarification-post-3-15/p1

Oh I didn't know of this announcement. The gac mm announcement also talks about invisible parameters in play and not only top x gp although we are all assuming it is only that.

Either way, the problem with this type of absurdity is that the system doesn't number of active players, you can get matched i.e. 37 to 48 which makes individuated calibration impossible. They need to change that bit, we should never get matched with large active player margins even if the total gp of those actives match.

There's another problem. That "system" was from 2018. There were no GLs and no relics then. Unless CG has constantly updated the algorithm to account for these changes in relative power (which I highly doubt) and carefully tested them at various relic levels (now, including R8) then the "accuracy" of the system has likely deteriorated instead of improved.

But I agree - the much larger issue is when there is a disparity in number of active players. We actually have a standing joke in our guild about 47 participants. If we are over 47 we have never won. If we are under 46, we have never lost. If we have either 46 or 47, we have a chance to get an even match.