"Olddumper;c-2444215" wrote:
"Salatious_Scrum;c-2444213" wrote:
There is no advantage in going first or second.
You can just as easily mess up on attacking either way, doesn’t matter what the score would be. Just focus on being the most efficient one with the roster you have without focusing so much as to the time zone or play style of your opponent.
If your opponent undermans 5 squads and you just ignore that you aren’t going to win. You need to know if you need to underman, need to full clear, can ignore top or bottom entirely. All of this information is way more valuable than a few points.
Paraphrasing CG's last response to this classic thread:
"Data don't show that people playing second win more, therefore we don't see the need to change anything."
