"Profit;c-2444706" wrote:
"Stokat;c-2444704" wrote:
"DarjeloSalas;c-2444526" wrote:
"Ragnarok_COTF;c-2444520" wrote:
No one else here has claimed to have data to support their position, have they?
There is at least one person stating definitively that there is an advantage to going second with no evidence to support their position, so unjustified conclusions are common place on this issue.
I would say logic will lead people to that conclusion. That the claim isn’t based on data does mean that it is unjustified.
Logic does not lead to that conclusion, your opinion does.
This opinion is shared by more people and has merit. I don't think anyone, including the poster you quote, is claiming ditterently. However, it is not definite and there are counter points with merit as well.
Eh what are you even on about? An opinion that something is the way it is lead to a conclusion that it is the way it is? That is just a nonsense circle argument.
It is a conclusion based on logic because it is founded on the assumption that having more knowledge provides a better position to make well founded decisions. Therefore having more knowledge about something (in this case knowing how many banners you need for a win) decreases risks and increases the chances of succeeding.
