Since Rey likely isn't a Jedi...

You said you used to be a game forum moderator?

.

"Woodroward;c-1019436" wrote:
What's utter nonsense is saying that I tried to insist that other people agree with me. That's your misinterpretation of my words. I have NEVER tried to make anyone agree with me. The only thing I have INSISTED on is that I saw it.

Laughing here. Go back and read what I wrote. I didn't misinterpret squat.
Now I know why your memory can't be trusted: because your eyes cannot be trusted.

"The0n3;c-1019437" wrote:
True... If he says he saw Rey with a Jedi tag and a lightsaber but it was removed before anyone even knew it happened.... We can't claim he is making it up, he's basically stating something similar as you Wood... Hahah xD i hope you can see this joke as a good example of how you're sounding here...

Again buddy, you said you saw, ppl said you didn't because it was never there. It was never there. You could start thinking to yourself that MAYBE you got it wrong? No one is accusing you of making it up, we're just saying it was never there. Then you started to reply as if you're been trolled, but you aren't, you're been told a FACT.

The information wasn't trolling information. It was the attitude and presentation of the posts that makes them trolling posts.

Whether it is fact or not is entirely a matter of opinion at this point because NO ONE has produced proof one way or the other. Luckily I am trying to convince no one of anything so I have no need to produce proof.

But I will scold scoffing trolls for being scoffing trolls. That's what I have been doing, and what I will continue to do.

I will also respond logically and reasonably to anyone who attempts to post in that fashion.

"ColonelTravis;c-1019445" wrote:

.

"Woodroward;c-1019436" wrote:
What's utter nonsense is saying that I tried to insist that other people agree with me. That's your misinterpretation of my words. I have NEVER tried to make anyone agree with me. The only thing I have INSISTED on is that I saw it.

Laughing here. Go back and read what I wrote. I didn't misinterpret squat.
Now I know why your memory can't be trusted: because your eyes cannot be trusted.

You did misinterpret my words. I did read what you wrote. You must have stopped reading after that paragraph because you obviously didn't get what I was saying. It isn't the other way around.

"Woodroward;c-1019448" wrote:

"The0n3;c-1019437" wrote:
True... If he says he saw Rey with a Jedi tag and a lightsaber but it was removed before anyone even knew it happened.... We can't claim he is making it up, he's basically stating something similar as you Wood... Hahah xD i hope you can see this joke as a good example of how you're sounding here...

Again buddy, you said you saw, ppl said you didn't because it was never there. It was never there. You could start thinking to yourself that MAYBE you got it wrong? No one is accusing you of making it up, we're just saying it was never there. Then you started to reply as if you're been trolled, but you aren't, you're been told a FACT.

Blah blah blah.

I am a troll.

Blah blah blah.

Yep, makes sense.

"Woodroward;c-1019452" wrote:

You did misinterpret my words. I did read what you wrote.

You looked at them and saw (like a Sith tag) something that was not there. You're really good at that sort of thing. Please tell me how "You've been insisting for two days that Kylo Ren was a Sith" = "What's utter nonsense is saying that I tried to insist that other people agree with me."

"Tatebomb;c-1019447" wrote:
Hey you can assume what you want. Your opinion doesn't matter only solid proof that I misremembered. My memory is perfect.



Ergo you are the troll.

Continuing to troll my posts doesn't actually turn my posts into troll posts.

Maybe you need to look up the definition of a troll too.

Or did you want me to do it for you? Because I won't. I've already established that I don't cater to trolls.

"ColonelTravis;c-1019456" wrote:

"Woodroward;c-1019452" wrote:

You did misinterpret my words. I did read what you wrote.

You looked at them and saw (like a Sith tag) something that was not there. You're really good at that sort of thing. Please tell me how "You've been insisting for two days that Kylo Ren was a Sith" = "What's utter nonsense is saying that I tried to insist that other people agree with me."

Do you think I only read the first sentence? That was addressing the whole paragraph. I paraphrased your entire paragraph into one sentence.

If I had been INSISTING that Kylo Ren had the Sith tag, I would have been INSISTING that other people agree with me.

However I have been INSISTING that I saw the Sith tag on him, nothing else. Saying I am making a charge means that I am contradicting others. Your whole statement was predicated on the fact that I am insisting others take my word.

If that wasn't the case, the burden of proof wouldn't apply to me at all.

";c-1019467" wrote:

"JohnTS676;c-1019483" wrote:

"Sideva_Cannord;c-1016233" wrote:

"Woodroward;c-1016204" wrote:
I'm still hoping Rey turns out to be Kylo's long lost sister.
They did allude to that possibility what with the lightsaber only supposed to be able to be used by those with Skywalker blood.

I think that would be weird. Both Han and Leia didn't know she existed? Besides, Skywalker blood could also mean Luke's daughter. Which, btw, I hope she's not.

Disney (or possibly the actress playing rey, can't quite remember) have already explicitly stated that rey's parents ARE NOT in episode 7 so it's none of the above actually

Yeah.. Just like they explicitly stated that Kahn wasn't in the rebooted Star Trek 2, but guess what?

"Woodroward;c-1019469" wrote:



Do you think I only read the first sentence? That was addressing the whole paragraph. I paraphrased your entire paragraph into one sentence.

If I had been INSISTING that Kylo Ren had the Sith tag, I would have been INSISTING that other people agree with me.

Just awful.

This is the last time I'm responding to you because your arguments are horrible and I have a life and can't waste my time with you any more. But what you did was called, "making up crap." I write for a living. You do not know this, but I chose words carefully and for a reason. If I thought you were trying to insist that everyone agree with you, I would have written that. But, as I said, you have found something that was never written by me or implied. Just like you saw something that was never there. I hope you don't play poker because you are an easy tell.

Insisting X Is True and Insisting Everyone Agree That X Is True are not the same things. <--- see this?

I'd cut you some slack if you said something like, "you know, maybe my memory cannot be trusted like I think it can be" because even you should be able to see that for two days you have convinced no one. But you're too stubborn to do that and so far down this road now that to admit you might not be right is too humiliating for you.