Sion and Nihilus feat broken?

If only we had a PSA on this...

"Ultra;c-2358262" wrote:
If only we had a PSA on this...

If only CG could word things correctly

If only we had a moderator that doesn't give attitude. It is YOUR job to read everything around here, not mine.

"oxinferno;c-2358265" wrote:
If only we had a moderator that doesn't give attitude. It is YOUR job to read everything around here, not mine.

lol

i think i’m going to choose to ignore you from now on :)

"LordDirt;c-2358263" wrote:

"Ultra;c-2358262" wrote:
If only we had a PSA on this...

If only CG could word things correctly

Maybe CG woke up too early when they wrote that description

that seems to be an acceptable reason for overlooking things according to OP

Volunteers still have duties they are expected to perform, but we're talking semantics here. Either way, they certainly would have a better idea about what's going on in here than I would. A simple "check the PSA in the top thread" would be sufficient.

And, I did briefly skim through the post and didn't happen to catch the name of the feat. Typically in the past, dev announcements are made when there are GC issues, like was done for this one:
https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/250547/galactic-challenge-thermal-detonator-issue

"Ultra;c-2358275" wrote:

"LordDirt;c-2358263" wrote:

"Ultra;c-2358262" wrote:
If only we had a PSA on this...

If only CG could word things correctly

Maybe CG woke up too early when they wrote that description

that seems to be an acceptable reason for overlooking things according to OP

Any code check-in performed by a developer goes through a process called code review that is performed by peers. At some point, a new build is created that contains these code changes. A series of unit tests are ran as part of that process. If the build passes, it gets handed off to QA. QA then tests these new code changes and possibly performs regression testing around the changes as well. There's a whole system of checks and balances to prevent bugs like this from hitting users, not reliant on one single person.

"Ultra;c-2358262" wrote:
If only we had a PSA on this...

If only important PSAs about faults that may cost you resources, would be announced ingame. There is a mailbox

"zatho;c-2358299" wrote:

"Ultra;c-2358262" wrote:
If only we had a PSA on this...

If only important PSAs about faults that may cost you resources, would be announced ingame. There is a mailbox

that’s a good idea but why are you telling me this?

OP asked a question and we have a PSA thread that answers that

what’s the point of telling me this?

Yes. They have to survive, although CG did not specify that.

It is unclear if CG programmed it wrong in relation to original intent or if the description was written incorrectly based on original intent.