Sith situation is out of hand

"NicolBolas;994374" wrote:
Don't spread rumors that dodge is higher when AI uses it without doing a study on it... do a power calculation to find the sample size you need, collect your data, and then run some stats on it if you want to prove anything

Although EA is unwilling to admit it, we all know (or should by now), the odds r tweaked in the AI's favor to balance the lack of a player making smarter choices.

Do I have statistics, a spread sheet and a graphical representation ? Nope. Do I need those in order to state what my observations over 15 months and thousands of arenas have demonstrated ? Nope.

The AI dodges more, resists more and lands debuffs more often than stated. For example...many months ago playing against an opposing Daka, AI would insta-rez far more frequently than 10%. I know it, u know it. Proof unnecessary. I don't need to prove the sky is blue to know it is. I don't have to prove the sun provides warmth to know it does. I don't have to prove the AI is bolstered to know it is. I don't have to prove that my assist callers bring my weakest toon while the AI calls the strongest to know it does.

The reason they won't cop 2 it is bcuz they don't wish to provide the percentages or equations used and I have no issue w/ them keeping that to themselves.

"Poxx;996272" wrote:

"NicolBolas;994374" wrote:
Don't spread rumors that dodge is higher when AI uses it without doing a study on it... do a power calculation to find the sample size you need, collect your data, and then run some stats on it if you want to prove anything

Although EA is unwilling to admit it, we all know (or should by now), the odds r tweaked in the AI's favor to balance the lack of a player making smarter choices.

Do I have statistics, a spread sheet and a graphical representation ? Nope. Do I need those in order to state what my observations over 15 months and thousands of arenas have demonstrated ? Nope.

The AI dodges more, resists more and lands debuffs more often than stated. For example...many months ago playing against an opposing Daka, AI would insta-rez far more frequently than 10%. I know it, u know it. Proof unnecessary. I don't need to prove the sky is blue to know it is. I don't have to prove the sun provides warmth to know it does. I don't have to prove the AI is bolstered to know it is. I don't have to prove that my assist callers bring my weakest toon while the AI calls the strongest to know it does.

The reason they won't cop 2 it is bcuz they don't wish to provide the percentages or equations used and I have no issue w/ them keeping that to themselves.

Finally, someone using thier fucking brain in here

"Mullato;996431" wrote:

"Poxx;996272" wrote:

"NicolBolas;994374" wrote:
Don't spread rumors that dodge is higher when AI uses it without doing a study on it... do a power calculation to find the sample size you need, collect your data, and then run some stats on it if you want to prove anything

Although EA is unwilling to admit it, we all know (or should by now), the odds r tweaked in the AI's favor to balance the lack of a player making smarter choices.

Do I have statistics, a spread sheet and a graphical representation ? Nope. Do I need those in order to state what my observations over 15 months and thousands of arenas have demonstrated ? Nope.

The AI dodges more, resists more and lands debuffs more often than stated. For example...many months ago playing against an opposing Daka, AI would insta-rez far more frequently than 10%. I know it, u know it. Proof unnecessary. I don't need to prove the sky is blue to know it is. I don't have to prove the sun provides warmth to know it does. I don't have to prove the AI is bolstered to know it is. I don't have to prove that my assist callers bring my weakest toon while the AI calls the strongest to know it does.

The reason they won't cop 2 it is bcuz they don't wish to provide the percentages or equations used and I have no issue w/ them keeping that to themselves.

Finally, someone using thier **** brain in here

+1million

I think it's a little more than that. +20% sith evasion against an accuracy arrow on a toon and evasion down from B2 still equals 80% sith evasion. I've been battling Zauls for a while and notice this every....single...battle. I'm cool with the stealths and the constant advantage. But never being able to hit a character even with every debuff on them in existance is just stupid.

New rebel. Evasion meta Challenger :)

Instead of complaining about it, you need to come up with a better game plan. I was the first person on my shard to launch Zaul. Then Zaul/sith/Zylo team. Now that everyone is running Zaul, I switched to Rex(l), Chaze, DN and Boba. When I get GK, I will either sub him in or launch double zeta Jedi team with GK.

If you chase the crowd, you end up being reactive. Think ahead, plan and let others try and keep up with you.

We want fun. Diversity is bs.

"mlb1399;996525" wrote:
Instead of complaining about it, you need to come up with a better game plan. I was the first person on my shard to launch Zaul. Then Zaul/sith/Zylo team. Now that everyone is running Zaul, I switched to Rex(l), Chaze, DN and Boba. When I get GK, I will either sub him in or launch double zeta Jedi team with GK.

If you chase the crowd, you end up being reactive. Think ahead, plan and let others try and keep up with you.

It's good being the king. 99% of players can't be like u.

"mlb1399;996525" wrote:
Instead of complaining about it, you need to come up with a better game plan. I was the first person on my shard to launch Zaul. Then Zaul/sith/Zylo team. Now that everyone is running Zaul, I switched to Rex(l), Chaze, DN and Boba. When I get GK, I will either sub him in or launch double zeta Jedi team with GK.

If you chase the crowd, you end up being reactive. Think ahead, plan and let others try and keep up with you.

You should write a best seller :open_mouth:

If you've actually played the game that long then you'd know that there is far more variety now than ever before

"WrathofCaedus;996619" wrote:
If you've actually played the game that long then you'd know that there is far more variety now than ever before

Wrong.