Slave I: Taunt is Silly
Is there any justification for CG to continue keeping the taunt on Slave I? The ship is an attacker and squishy. No taunt would also likely make a nice diff with Exec with some of the counters that ha...
Forum Discussion
"CG_Doja_Fett_MINI;c-2289411" wrote:"MaricSkywalker;c-2289403" wrote:"CG_Doja_Fett_MINI;c-2289402" wrote:
I reached out to the devs and they stated rather than removing Taunt, they decided to keep it and try to make Slave I more useful/tankier as a reinforcement by way of additional Protection Up and the counter/target lock interactions. Also, there will be some minor AI fixes introduced soon that we will provide more details on as it comes closer.
Changes to fix the executor?
The AI changes I was referring to above were for Slave I/Firespray/BF's Starship/or whatever it ends up being. Executor is being looked into as well, per this post
Will the AI changes somehow make a squishy attacker with a forced taunt somehow not die almost immediately upon RI?
