Forum Discussion
7 years ago
"cannonfodder_iv;c-1649619" wrote:"Waqui;c-1649591" wrote:
@Boov
Kyno's defense of the behaviour of Han's ability is irrelevant to my own point. He and I agree, that it works as intended. However his defense of the way the ability description is worded is weak and flawed."BubbaFett;c-1649519" wrote:"cannonfodder_iv;c-1649486" wrote:
The TM mechanics are unchanged. Han starts an encounter with 100% TM. Anyone else at 100% TM can also go. When Han's special was introduced, there weren't nearly as many TM shenanigans so the likelihood of having multiple toons at 100% at the start of a round was low. Now, with all of the %TM gains (zEP / JTR / etc. etc.), it's commonplace and we noticed it a lot more. I've actually seen an instance where the Tank in P2 didn't take a turn coming out of a topple before it got toppled again.
Is it "right"? Depends on your opinion, but it's accurate. Should the mechanic for "taking the next immediate action", like GMY's, be more broadly applied? I believe so, and it should be applied to Thrawn, CLS, FOO, and any other direct TM manipulators. That explicit action should override passive TM gains from leaderships/uniques, again IMHO, but those are just opinions.
Then they need to change the wording of his kit.....
@BubbaFett @Waqui Is this better? Not that the wording of the ability itself (unchanged) nowhere states that he will be the first to take a turn.
I never, ever claimed, that Han should be guaranteed to take the first action. What's your point? You clearly missed my point, but please explain yours. It doesn't make sense as a response to me.
About SWGOH General Discussion
Discuss and share your feedback on Star Wars: Galaxy of Heroes with fellow players.79,690 PostsLatest Activity: 2 days ago
Recent Discussions
- 2 days ago
- 3 days ago
- 3 days ago