Stop the TW mismatches

"Waqui;c-2122935" wrote:

"StarSon;c-2122848" wrote:

"Waqui;c-2122829" wrote:

"StarSon;c-2121615" wrote:

"Waqui;c-2121612" wrote:

"Ggdjqjchsabjdj;c-2120272" wrote:

"Waqui;c-2120262" wrote:

"Ggdjqjchsabjdj;c-2120220" wrote:

"Waqui;c-2120194" wrote:

"Ggdjqjchsabjdj;c-2120186" wrote:

"Waqui;c-2119957" wrote:

"Ggdjqjchsabjdj;c-2119948" wrote:

"DarjeloSalas;c-2119604" wrote:
Any data to explain your point @Natetiffer

End of this TW I probably will if I remember to take screenshots.

Why not take your screenshots now or show your proof now?

It's setup phase?

In which case you've already been matched. No need to wait to document that your opponents "have nothing" compared to your g13s.

Ummmm...?

Your own claim/words:

"Ggdjqjchsabjdj;c-2119221" wrote:
Haha yeah. I’m in a bad guild with my friends. I got g13s and stuff and our opponents have nothing so it’s easy wins.

No I mean what’s your point? My point is that the matchmaking doesn’t take into account characters and stuff. What’s yours?

The same as DarjeloSalas:

Let's see your data that supports your claim. Why wait?

I mean, just read back a bit. There have been several screenshots of the matchups in this thread, and some in the other active thread.

Edit: and just to give another example

What's your point and how is it relevant to what you quote?

My point is going in with fewer players more often than not will result in a favorable matchup, and it is relevant because it is some of my data.

That's not what @Ggdjqjchsabjdj and I were discussing. Your quote was pointless. Your comment may be relevant to others but not to what you quoted.

But ok, thanx at least for explaining your point.

I quoted you asking him for data. There is lots of data to backup his claims in this thread, and the other one. I added the screenshot after the fact for extra data. Not sure how that isn't what you were discussing or how my reply was "pointless" to that discussion.