Forum Discussion

imelhorn's avatar
imelhorn
New Spectator
7 years ago

Territory war match up

Date of TW: 29 October
Our Guild GP: 86M
Their Guild GP: 124M
# of Players our guild joined: 49/50
# of Players their guild: don’t know

We have been absolutely crushed in the last ~10 TW because guilds purposefully lower participating members with higher GP to match against guilds with high participation and lower average GP. Can you just change match ups to better reflect average GP or participation rate? As opposed to penalizing guilds with higher participation? We’ve had as much as 60M gp difference before because higher guilds benefit from lowering participation which doesn’t make any sense for a game that wants to maximize participation


6 Replies

  • We have exactly the same after reaching 60M active GP. We are being matched against a guilds with avg. GP about 45-50% larger than ours. And even few players less on their side means nothing if our best player has GP like theirs 25th. You have taken all the fun of what is in my opinion best part of the game from whole our guild...

    And it is so easy to limit GP difference to about 25%, then it wouldnt be lost in setup stage.
  • Have the matchmaking go through minimum 3 checks:

    Total GP: +/- 10%? Yes? Next. No? Match denied.
    Minimum players active: +/- 3? Yes? Next. No? Match denied.
    Average active individual GP: +/- 10% Yes? TW launches. No? Match denied.

    Using above example:

    -Total GP of your opponent would have only been max approx 97 million.
    -Active players would have to be at least 46/50.
    -Average GP would be max 1.89 million
  • How do we get to face you? We are 119m guild matched against a 208m. First two territories are nothing but traya and Revan. We have three Revans and no trayas. Today is actually our first attempt at HSTR.
  • How many defence teams can you set? Take that number and double it, it gives you how many people have signed up in the guild that has the fewest that joined.
  • @Jaconis

    That's probably the worst mismatch I've seen GP-wise. Ouch.
  • "Vendi1983;c-1683554" wrote:
    @Jaconis

    That's probably the worst mismatch I've seen GP-wise. Ouch.


    Yeah, most aren’t even mad because it’s so ridiculous, it’s crossed into funny.