Thanks CG!
I just want to say to the leadership at CG making the decisions, thanks for incentivizing me to reduce my spending on the game by such a significant amount! I'm saving money I can spend elsewhere du...
Forum Discussion
You’ve been whining about the game for as long as I can remember and still spending money it - you sure showed CG!
And you've been whining about me and others whining. So what's that say about you, CG Defense Force member?
Is it voluntary, or do they pay you?
I am just amazed that someone who seems to find every aspect of this game a source of misery and disappointment still plays it at all - never mind continues to pay to support something they clearly despise.
If someone were complaining as much about their job as you do this game, I’d implore them to quit and find another one.
You may not believe it - but I am actually trying to help you. It can’t be good for your health to be this negative about something that nobody is forcing you to participate in. At least you didn’t mention Datacrons this time.
Miserable? Not there yet. If anything, CG has made me care less and less about the game because whoever is in charge doesn't seem to care. There is plenty about the game I enjoy, but at times I get aggravated about certain issues, which reminds me of the other issues of the game. And, I am quite happy to get vocal about it here, where it should be appropriate. If I didn't enjoy the game, I would've quit it like I did MSF and Raid.
Whether you believe it or not, I don't hit the level of stress you think I do about the game. There have been stretches of months that I don't post anything because I was content with the progress of the game. I also posted positively about quite a few improvements and new releases over the years. Especially when CG was communicative with us consistently, when they had a beta program, when they were more actively engaged with players.
And I didn't mention datacrons because they are not nearly as troublesome right now as the failures and apathy of CG leadership.
If they had respect for players, they would take an implementation break for 3 months and prioritize fixing bugs and working player issues. They've done it before a couple times in the past and told us as much. But that seems a low potential option now.
