TIE Bomber confirmed?

"Jarvind;c-2070195" wrote:

"littleMAC77;c-2070189" wrote:

"Vendi1983;c-2070158" wrote:
Just don't be lazy and make it have crew, please.

Eh, bring on the crewless ship! We don't need another nameless tie pilot to farm and gear up to relics to be useable in some fleet.

Yeah, personally I'm thoroughly enjoying my Malevolence tank that outperforms Hound's Tooth at 6 stars and didn't require me to G13 a character I never use.

You realize that nego players jump out of their seats with joy when they see a malevolence fleet on their climb?

And also, sorry you don’t see all the places that G13 bossk shines, you’re truly missing out.

All ready for the tie bomber!!

That was my question and the first part of the answere were part of my question, so this is how it should look like:

Q: Dear Developers! There are 2 Empire Capital ships in the game, but only 5 Empire starfighters and non of them is a Tank. Without a good tank a fleet isn’t competitive. Are there any plans to make an Empire Tank starfighter? TIE Bomber would be a perfect ship to make, it had many appearances in the canon and it would carry on the line of bombers(Hyena, Y-wing)

A: CG_Miller - The Empire has a ton of cool TIEs we have yet to put into the game as collectible units. The TIE Bomber is just one of them, and your instinct on carrying on the tradition in bombers like the Hyena and Y-wing is a smart one.

So nothing is confirmed, all he said there is a lot of TIEs to put in the game.

"ZAP;c-2070237" wrote:

"Jarvind;c-2070195" wrote:

"littleMAC77;c-2070189" wrote:

"Vendi1983;c-2070158" wrote:
Just don't be lazy and make it have crew, please.

Eh, bring on the crewless ship! We don't need another nameless tie pilot to farm and gear up to relics to be useable in some fleet.

Yeah, personally I'm thoroughly enjoying my Malevolence tank that outperforms Hound's Tooth at 6 stars and didn't require me to G13 a character I never use.

You realize that nego players jump out of their seats with joy when they see a malevolence fleet on their climb?

And also, sorry you don’t see all the places that G13 bossk shines, you’re truly missing out.

I'm always glad to see my GAC opponent fluffed their GP with a G13 Bossk given how easy he easy to beat.

EDIT: Leaving typo for effect.

I would like to see the TIE Defender make it into the game. It would go great with the Chimera.

"Chucko_marek;c-2070429" wrote:
I would like to see the TIE Defender make it into the game. It would go great with the Chimera.

+1

I would also be OK with the Tie Bomber being pilot less, just like the Y-Wing & Hyena.

That being said, IF a TIE Defender ever arrives, I hope it is based somewhat on the version from the 1994 PC game TIE Fighter.

Regular Lasers, Ion Canon, tractor and/or jamming beam, lots of missles etc. In other words, make this ship somewhat OP. The Empire faction needs a little bit of oomph.

This time, I hope the TIED gets a pilot. Perhaps Vult Skerris from Rebels or Baron Soontir Fel.
I know we are drifting into legends a little but I digress.

"ZAP;c-2070237" wrote:

"Jarvind;c-2070195" wrote:

"littleMAC77;c-2070189" wrote:

"Vendi1983;c-2070158" wrote:
Just don't be lazy and make it have crew, please.

Eh, bring on the crewless ship! We don't need another nameless tie pilot to farm and gear up to relics to be useable in some fleet.

Yeah, personally I'm thoroughly enjoying my Malevolence tank that outperforms Hound's Tooth at 6 stars and didn't require me to G13 a character I never use.

You realize that nego players jump out of their seats with joy when they see a malevolence fleet on their climb?

And also, sorry you don’t see all the places that G13 bossk shines, you’re truly missing out.

What? I never said I didn't have a G13 Bossk, or that I thought Malevolence was great on defense.

"Jarvind;c-2070478" wrote:

"ZAP;c-2070237" wrote:

"Jarvind;c-2070195" wrote:

"littleMAC77;c-2070189" wrote:

"Vendi1983;c-2070158" wrote:
Just don't be lazy and make it have crew, please.

Eh, bring on the crewless ship! We don't need another nameless tie pilot to farm and gear up to relics to be useable in some fleet.

Yeah, personally I'm thoroughly enjoying my Malevolence tank that outperforms Hound's Tooth at 6 stars and didn't require me to G13 a character I never use.

You realize that nego players jump out of their seats with joy when they see a malevolence fleet on their climb?

And also, sorry you don’t see all the places that G13 bossk shines, you’re truly missing out.

What? I never said I didn't have a G13 Bossk, or that I thought Malevolence was great on defense.

Seemed clear you said you had bossk at G13 and don’t use him and I said you’re missing out on a toon that’s good in many areas of the game.

"TVF;c-2070411" wrote:

"ZAP;c-2070237" wrote:

"Jarvind;c-2070195" wrote:

"littleMAC77;c-2070189" wrote:

"Vendi1983;c-2070158" wrote:
Just don't be lazy and make it have crew, please.

Eh, bring on the crewless ship! We don't need another nameless tie pilot to farm and gear up to relics to be useable in some fleet.

Yeah, personally I'm thoroughly enjoying my Malevolence tank that outperforms Hound's Tooth at 6 stars and didn't require me to G13 a character I never use.

You realize that nego players jump out of their seats with joy when they see a malevolence fleet on their climb?

And also, sorry you don’t see all the places that G13 bossk shines, you’re truly missing out.

I'm always glad to see my GAC opponent fluffed their GP with a G13 Bossk given how easy he easy to beat.

EDIT: Leaving typo for effect.

At your level, your opponent shouldn't be putting bossk on D. Perhaps your stellar GAC results are due to you facing inferior players.

All I said was bossk shines in many areas of the game, including GAC if used correctly, which is absolutely true.

And we don’t all have perfect killer rosters like you and your constant gloating and putting others down is tired.