Increase rewards for bottom row. It gets ignored because no one wants to waste ships so they all focus top and middle. Or make the buffs for top and middle favor defense, but rewards are always more fun. The new officer tools look very helpful IMHO, although I don't know why the other officers in my guild did not deign to use them. Is there something I'm missing or is it just not apparent enough? Separate in game chat rooms would be great, so discussion about raids and tw and tb can be kept coherent. An element from tb where finishing one sector can give you buffs in another sector might make things more interesting. A bigger feature would be to have choices or customization for ai behavior, especially on defense. E.g. set a squad to focus fire on toons with a certain tag like Attackers. Or set a toon to prioritize one ability over another any time they are both off of cooldown. Very interesting mechanic that capital ships were not excluded from the one-use rule. I like it! It is unclear what happens when you kill a squad leader and lose, then go to fight them again. Which one is the new leader? I know it is probably same as GW but I'm not certain what happens there, either. Would be very great for both if there was some sort of definitive indication of the current enemy squad leader.Fellow testers, please feel free to add to the list, or offer better suggestions! If you just want to complain, make your own thread! :trollface:

Suggestion to fix match-making: Implement a rating system like ELO, and use that rating for both rewards and matchmaking.Basic things common to ELO like systems:Winning increases rating.Losing decreases rating.Swgoh modifications to ELO I'd suggest:Do a one-time rating seeding to get the system going.Otherwise, new guilds start at zero rating.Rating cannot drop under zero.Could also make ELO player specific, with the guild's rating being the participant's average. Something like that might be necessary depending on how quickly the reward scale changes, to prevent guild members moving en masse to a different guild each week, where the destination guild is just low enough for an easier win but rewards are about the same as their true rating.

One thing i had a hard time monitoring is who had had attacked and who hadn't... one sugestion to fix this i have is to add everyone registeted in TW to defensive banners & offensive banners on the status screen at zero... this way not only officers, but all guild members can see who has attacks left and a rough estimate by comparing defensive score to offensive score... not perfect but it would help immensely.Overall great job guys! I love it! Rewards are sweet too... but not sweet enough to rot out our teeth... which is healthy so im happy! <3 <3 <3

"Loose_Lee;c-1347759" wrote:One thing i had a hard time monitoring is who had had attacked and who hadn't... one sugestion to fix this i have is to add everyone registeted in TW to defensive banners & offensive banners on the status screen at zero... this way not only officers, but all guild members can see who has attacks left and a rough estimate by comparing defensive score to offensive score... not perfect but it would help immensely.Overall great job guys! I love it! Rewards are sweet too... but not sweet enough to rot out our teeth... which is healthy so im happy! <3 <3 <3I think the zero designation will be in the final release. Overall thought it was fun definitely not tournaments 2.0 like some were thinking. And not a time sink like TB even for officers.

Ability to sort squad list by power rating. Useful when I've already used my top squads and then a new sector opens up.

"Franimus;c-1347794" wrote: Ability to sort squad list by power rating. Useful when I've already used my top squads and then a new sector opens up.Some one mentioned that in another post and a dev responded so i think its a possibility

TW Constructive Feedback Thread | EA Forums

1Revenger11
7 years ago
Suggestion to fix match-making: Implement a rating system like ELO, and use that rating for both rewards and matchmaking.

Basic things common to ELO like systems:

Winning increases rating.
Losing decreases rating.

Swgoh modifications to ELO I'd suggest:

Do a one-time rating seeding to get the system going.
Otherwise, new guilds start at zero rating.
Rating cannot drop under zero.

Could also make ELO player specific, with the guild's rating being the participant's average. Something like that might be necessary depending on how quickly the reward scale changes, to prevent guild members moving en masse to a different guild each week, where the destination guild is just low enough for an easier win but rewards are about the same as their true rating.
Taintdragons
8 years ago
One thing i had a hard time monitoring is who had had attacked and who hadn't... one sugestion to fix this i have is to add everyone registeted in TW to defensive banners & offensive banners on the status screen at zero... this way not only officers, but all guild members can see who has attacks left and a rough estimate by comparing defensive score to offensive score... not perfect but it would help immensely.

Overall great job guys! I love it! Rewards are sweet too... but not sweet enough to rot out our teeth... which is healthy so im happy! <3 <3 <3
jjldb80
8 years ago
"Loose_Lee;c-1347759" wrote:
One thing i had a hard time monitoring is who had had attacked and who hadn't... one sugestion to fix this i have is to add everyone registeted in TW to defensive banners & offensive banners on the status screen at zero... this way not only officers, but all guild members can see who has attacks left and a rough estimate by comparing defensive score to offensive score... not perfect but it would help immensely.

Overall great job guys! I love it! Rewards are sweet too... but not sweet enough to rot out our teeth... which is healthy so im happy! <3 <3 <3

I think the zero designation will be in the final release. Overall thought it was fun definitely not tournaments 2.0 like some were thinking. And not a time sink like TB even for officers.
Franimus
8 years ago

Ability to sort squad list by power rating. Useful when I've already used my top squads and then a new sector opens up.
jjldb80
8 years ago
"Franimus;c-1347794" wrote:

Ability to sort squad list by power rating. Useful when I've already used my top squads and then a new sector opens up.

Some one mentioned that in another post and a dev responded so i think its a possibility
jjldb80
8 years ago
"MalgosRagnos;c-1347826" wrote:
I would like to see offence squads/heroes being allowed to be re-used with their stats carry-forward if they survive an offensive attack.

The mechanics for TW is similar to GW, that defensive squads that survive keep the stats and carry-forward to a new offensive battle, and allow offensive squads to continue being used until they are no longer viable.

I disagree. That would make it so easy on offense. I think this way adds strategy to how you choose defensive squads and how you choose matchups on offense.
Sorkip29
New Spectator
8 years ago
Did someone recognize a restriction for offense? Would it be possible to attack with a huge amount of even weak squads to win? As the damage done in a first attack remains for the defender.
giontza
8 years ago
Every successful defense should be rewarded some banners (5 or 10 banners, or even just 1 banner).
I think this will lead to a more complex strategy and in the end these banners can make the difference.
bylecoabyweszlo
8 years ago
"FitzChivalry;c-1347933" wrote:
Every successful defense should be rewarded some banners (5 or 10 banners, or even just 1 banner).
I think this will lead to a more complex strategy and in the end these banners can make the difference.

Awesome idea and rly noteworthy.
witschnerd1
8 years ago
"Jamesm;c-1347839" wrote:
"MalgosRagnos;c-1347826" wrote:
I would like to see offence squads/heroes being allowed to be re-used with their stats carry-forward if they survive an offensive attack.

The mechanics for TW is similar to GW, that defensive squads that survive keep the stats and carry-forward to a new offensive battle, and allow offensive squads to continue being used until they are no longer viable.

I disagree. That would make it so easy on offense. I think this way adds strategy to how you choose defensive squads and how you choose matchups on offense.

I also disagree, don't want one sqaud killing 10 sqauds. It would ruin the whole thing