"DarjeloSalas;c-2256931" wrote:
"Zedstar;c-2256929" wrote:
"UdalCuain;c-2256928" wrote:
"Zedstar;c-2256926" wrote:
"UdalCuain;c-2256921" wrote:
It's not always sandbagging.
How many defence slots you having to set? And have you definitely got the right guild? There's a few alliances out there that make tiny adjustments to the guild names.
Defence slots is 22 and we went in with a full guild so they 100% sand bagged
Again, it's not necessarily sandbagging. People have real lives. Everyone is really quick to accuse people of trying to cheat the system. I shouldn't have signed up for this TW as I have assignments due, but I did. We still are only going into TW with 40 as lots of guildies have stuff on this week.
ok ok yes maybe there is a chance its not sand bagging but all routes point to it is, but yes i agree there is a very slim chance that it might not be.... but lets face it we all know it is
No we don’t. Please stop with your “100% sandbagged” drivel.
My guild (320M GP) are fighting this war with 41/50 signed up. There is nothing deliberate about it.
In lots of high end guilds TW is optional, because people who sign up but can’t commit to being available to attack are a liability.
Yes, the matchmaking sucks and needs addressed, but spouting blandishments about deliberate sandbagging when you know nothing of the sort is not helping the discussion.
I just said it might not be sandbagging, but all fingers point to it.... if the match making system was changed to Guild GP and not signed up GP it would solve all the problems
But yes it might not be sand bagging.... but sorry in this case i think it is
but there is no proof either way so you might be right and so might i
