Hi Developers,Along with the list of successful defence and attack banners in TW, please also provide a list of number of Unsuccessful attempts by a guild member. Currently there is no way in determining whether a guild member have used his full roster or just attempted one This is specially problematic when there are low scores and people say they have attacked but were unsuccessful.This can be true some time but not most of the time. Hope others also face the same issue in TW. This will help in removing free loaders from the guild.

A way around this is to lock all zones and require a rogue action to attack. This way you can see their banner count, and their rogue action (attempt) count.

"OneWorldAway;c-1708275" wrote:A way around this is to lock all zones and require a rogue action to attack. This way you can see their banner count, and their rogue action (attempt) count.This is a way around, so there is a way, but yes we need a better way

"LoreckAvery1;c-1708382" wrote:Well wr are trying but still difficult as we don't use discord etc. But thanks for the suggestion :). Adding @CG_SBCrumb in case he wants to look into the problem **** well. Our guild uses discord, and it helps so much on every guild activity, that you should strongly consider it. Instant communication, and the ability to attach screenshots etc......Think about how valuable it is for a member to say "I've got a squad that can take it", or worse "Hey, be careful of that FO squad, I left them with TM loaded".

"OneWorldAway;c-1708275" wrote:A way around this is to lock all zones and require a rogue action to attack. This way you can see their banner count, and their rogue action (attempt) count. :o What an idea!

Would be nice to see how much remaining GP each guildmate has in their TW roster at the end of war

TW: Unsuccessful Attempts | EA Forums

14 Replies

OneWorldAway88
7 years ago
A way around this is to lock all zones and require a rogue action to attack. This way you can see their banner count, and their rogue action (attempt) count.
Emguy158
7 years ago
Would be nice to see how much remaining GP each guildmate has in their TW roster at the end of war
LoreckAvery1
7 years ago
Problem with locking is that some members might not have the team to take out one in the non locked zone and will end up in wasting teams.

I know we need to trust others.. but sometimes others take advantage of it.
NyKynoe
7 years ago
"OneWorldAway;c-1708275" wrote:
A way around this is to lock all zones and require a rogue action to attack. This way you can see their banner count, and their rogue action (attempt) count.

This is a way around, so there is a way, but yes we need a better way
Waquira
7 years ago
"LoreckAvery1;c-1708283" wrote:
Problem with locking is that some members might not have the team to take out one in the non locked zone and will end up in wasting teams.
.

Which non—locked zone? Lock all zones. Key word: "all"
LoreckAvery1
7 years ago
Wanqui. I understand the operative part of ALL. However this could be problematic when we want people to genuinely avoud attacking certain zones so that they might not end up wasting teams.

For example my guild doesn't have any Traya so if there is a Traya wall and we know that people will end up wasting too many teams to take down one then we block that zone and put focus on manageable zone.

Hope you understand my POV.
Waquira
7 years ago
"LoreckAvery1;c-1708371" wrote:
Wanqui. I understand the operative part of ALL. However this could be problematic when we want people to genuinely avoud attacking certain zones so that they might not end up wasting teams.

For example my guild doesn't have any Traya so if there is a Traya wall and we know that people will end up wasting too many teams to take down one then we block that zone and put focus on manageable zone.

Hope you understand my POV.

Lock all zones. Use guild—chat, banner texts or a third party chat application to inform your guild which zones to attack.

(And try educating your guild to only attack if they have a team with a proper chance of winning or killing at least one enemy.)
LoreckAvery1
7 years ago
Well wr are trying but still difficult as we don't use discord etc. But thanks for the suggestion :). Adding @CG_SBCrumb in case he wants to look into the problem ss well.
LoreckAvery1
7 years ago
Lol.. not sure why **** are there. Not used any x_rated word
FolsomTony
7 years ago
"LoreckAvery1;c-1708382" wrote:
Well wr are trying but still difficult as we don't use discord etc. But thanks for the suggestion :). Adding @CG_SBCrumb in case he wants to look into the problem **** well.

Our guild uses discord, and it helps so much on every guild activity, that you should strongly consider it. Instant communication, and the ability to attach screenshots etc......Think about how valuable it is for a member to say "I've got a squad that can take it", or worse "Hey, be careful of that FO squad, I left them with TM loaded".