Forum Discussion
- NotRealUltraSeasoned Newcomer
"Iy4oy4s;c-2260343" wrote:
"Kyno;c-2260311" wrote:
"Iy4oy4s;c-2260294" wrote:
Unaligned Force User sounds really bad, it should be Neutral Force User.
Maybe they didnt want it to be confused with the neutral tag.
But I also agree that neutral isnt really the "other option" between jedi and sith.
Oh, I like where you are going with the neutral thing.
How about "Light Force User" "Dark Force User"
that's what LS / DS tags are for, on top of this tag - Iy4oy4sNew Novice
"Ultra;c-2260353" wrote:
"Iy4oy4s;c-2260343" wrote:
"Kyno;c-2260311" wrote:
"Iy4oy4s;c-2260294" wrote:
Unaligned Force User sounds really bad, it should be Neutral Force User.
Maybe they didnt want it to be confused with the neutral tag.
But I also agree that neutral isnt really the "other option" between jedi and sith.
Oh, I like where you are going with the neutral thing.
How about "Light Force User" "Dark Force User"
that's what LS / DS tags are for, on top of this tag
LS/DS tags include non-force users. Light Force user is different...like Rebel and Rebel fighter. "AhnaldisGOAT;c-2260354" wrote:
"Kyno;c-2260311" wrote:
"Iy4oy4s;c-2260294" wrote:
Unaligned Force User sounds really bad, it should be Neutral Force User.
Maybe they didnt want it to be confused with the neutral tag.
But I also agree that neutral isnt really the "other option" between jedi and sith.
That brings up a question that’s nagged at me since I read the new tag.
Why are we getting “Unaligned Force User” as a tag when there is still NO ONE in the Neutral tag? I understand it for people such as SLKR and GL Rey, but Visas Marr? Ventress? Fulcrum? CAT? I would like to hear why we have a neutral tag, if we’re just going to add tags that say the exact same thing with more word salad.
I’m not trying to be rude here, I’m genuinely curious about CG’s thought process.
Neutral and Unaligned Force User don't mean the same thing though. Eg. Ventress isn't a Sith but she's still a Dark side user. CAT isn't a Jedi but she's still a Light side user. So why would they be neutral? What are they neutral in the context of? They're not neutral by virtue of simply being neither Jedi nor Sith, because they're still clearly aligned with the dark or light side.
Honestly at this point I'd rather them just never give anyone the Neutral tag and just get rid of it in game. Seems like it would just raise a lot of questions as to who should get it and what exactly it means- NotRealUltraSeasoned NewcomerBH aren’t neutral tho
- Kyno isn't CG
- Iy4oy4sNew Novice
"TVF;c-2260501" wrote:
Kyno isn't CG
More like CG attuned."Ultra;c-2260483" wrote:
BH aren’t neutral tho
So you are saying that Mando, Greef and the RC should be darkside? I think that Bounty Hunters as a whole fit the neutral tag, but LS/DS is based on their choices.
I say just drop the unaligned and add Light Force User and Dark Force User. It sounds better and does the same thing. "twstdbydsn;c-2260500" wrote:
"Kyno;c-2260311" wrote:
"Iy4oy4s;c-2260294" wrote:
Unaligned Force User sounds really bad, it should be Neutral Force User.
Maybe they didnt want it to be confused with the neutral tag.
But I also agree that neutral isnt really the "other option" between jedi and sith.
The tag no one is using? :p
For a second this morning I thought you guys removed it. Guess I never realized that it was in the section of filters before the alphabetical part.
That doesnt mean they will not use it.- NotRealUltraSeasoned Newcomer
"Iy4oy4s;c-2260507" wrote:
"TVF;c-2260501" wrote:
Kyno isn't CG
More like CG attuned."Ultra;c-2260483" wrote:
BH aren’t neutral tho
So you are saying that Mando, Greef and the RC should be darkside? I think that Bounty Hunters as a whole fit the neutral tag, but LS/DS is based on their choices.
I said they aren't neutral, not dark side "Nauros;c-2260517" wrote:
"Kyno;c-2260509" wrote:
"twstdbydsn;c-2260500" wrote:
"Kyno;c-2260311" wrote:
"Iy4oy4s;c-2260294" wrote:
Unaligned Force User sounds really bad, it should be Neutral Force User.
Maybe they didnt want it to be confused with the neutral tag.
But I also agree that neutral isnt really the "other option" between jedi and sith.
The tag no one is using? :p
For a second this morning I thought you guys removed it. Guess I never realized that it was in the section of filters before the alphabetical part.
That doesnt mean they will not use it.
Weren't there some problems with it the last time it came up?
Yes, and at this point, I believe that issue is not an issue any more.- ReeseiSeasoned Newcomer
"Kyno;c-2260257" wrote:
He was a receiver, not really a user. He could only sense it, but not actually use it.
Scavenger Rey could do both which is what makes her a user.
Chirrut uses the force to tune his senses and his perception, and to guide his actions. He achieves things that a non-force user couldn’t do. That is using the force just as much as swinging laser swords and lifting rocks.
We debate whether Finn was using the force, but we were never quite sure. There’s no debate with Chirrut. He wasn’t a Jedi. But he was one heck of an unaligned force user.
About SWGOH General Discussion
Discuss and share your feedback on Star Wars: Galaxy of Heroes with fellow players.
78,030 PostsLatest Activity: 7 minutes agoRelated Posts
Recent Discussions
- 7 minutes ago
- 16 minutes ago
- 31 minutes ago
- 31 minutes ago
- 43 minutes ago