Unaligned Force User speculation
I’m thinking in addition to the reys and visas, Fulcrum ahsoka, asajj ventress, we may even get a rebels/solo maul (Never mind the insights just showed em all)
Forum Discussion
"AhnaldisGOAT;c-2260354" wrote:"Kyno;c-2260311" wrote:"Iy4oy4s;c-2260294" wrote:
Unaligned Force User sounds really bad, it should be Neutral Force User.
Maybe they didnt want it to be confused with the neutral tag.
But I also agree that neutral isnt really the "other option" between jedi and sith.
That brings up a question that’s nagged at me since I read the new tag.
Why are we getting “Unaligned Force User” as a tag when there is still NO ONE in the Neutral tag? I understand it for people such as SLKR and GL Rey, but Visas Marr? Ventress? Fulcrum? CAT? I would like to hear why we have a neutral tag, if we’re just going to add tags that say the exact same thing with more word salad.
I’m not trying to be rude here, I’m genuinely curious about CG’s thought process.
Neutral and Unaligned Force User don't mean the same thing though. Eg. Ventress isn't a Sith but she's still a Dark side user. CAT isn't a Jedi but she's still a Light side user. So why would they be neutral? What are they neutral in the context of? They're not neutral by virtue of simply being neither Jedi nor Sith, because they're still clearly aligned with the dark or light side.
Honestly at this point I'd rather them just never give anyone the Neutral tag and just get rid of it in game. Seems like it would just raise a lot of questions as to who should get it and what exactly it means
