"RuFiOHHHHH;c-1462856" wrote:
Ever since TW came out it's been far and away the best mode in the game. This update will severely hurt the fun of TW offense. I'm in a top tier guild that has had only three ties - once on the first war and twice against guilds who placed absolutely no defense. At this point ties only happen if one guild intentionally forces a tie. This would be easy to resolve by having a simple tiebreaker of whichever guild placed more GP on defense. Then nobody would ignore defense completely and the problem would be solved.
This on the other hand RUINS the fun of tw, the only mode where my less useful characters finally had a purpose. I could run two g9 squads against a weak defense, break it down and be able to contribute to the guild. Now I have to put everything but the absolute best units back on the shelf because if you don't kill a squad with 5 units left standing you're hurting your team. This also punishes guilds who have weaker players and will lead to more infighting in guilds for people who lose their attacks.
How did this terrible idea get put in play? Less fun, more arguing?
I will quote it because it warrants repeating. This is not a good change for the reasons listed.
The old system was good because you could whittle down teams, you could use your whole squad, weaker players could also contribute and the amount of coordination was manageable. Now beating a team gives only 5 of possible 20 banners. To max performance will place a massive burden of coordinating attacks on officers especially for international guilds with different time zones.
To quote again: less fun more arguing. Not good. Please reconside given that ties only impacted a very small amount of TWs..
If you want to award bonus banners then why not simply using them only if there is a tie to break and otherwise ignore them. Keep the system as it is and if there is a tie under the current system then the team with more bonus banners wins
