Visas Marr and Rey

"mInEcRaFtEr0617;c-2089879" wrote:


"Debatable"? Implying that you yourself do not take it seriously?

Just a heads up a Straw man fallacy IS a type of logical fallacy. Not something we should really be debating. Just do a bit of research.

And here is the definition (I will post the source in a comment bellow this one if you want to see for yourself) of a Straw Man fallacy just for reference:

"Substituting a person’s actual position or argument with a distorted, exaggerated, or misrepresented version of the position or the argument."

Notice the "distorted" part, and the "misrepresented" part. If you wouldn't consider my argument,

"It was more about the lessons behind them. The meaningful dialogue was what made it so significant. Yoda’s lessons about the temptations of the dark side, about how size does not matter in the force, about how the dark side is the lesser but more tempting aspect of the force... you wont see any of that in TLJ or TROS. Training isnt just about training the body, it is about learning wisdom and understanding of the force."

to be misrepresented and/or distorted in your summary of it,

"Ahh, so it's Jedi training so long as you chat a bit afterwards, of course."

then I do not know why we are even debating this. You "dumbing down" my argument meets the exact criteria of the definition of a Straw Man fallacy.

Correct. It's a fictional saga about magic men with laser swords fighting space Germany.

I was wrong, thank you. My research showed me a logical fallacy is simultaneously pointless as it's equivalent to just fallacy, and inappropriate to use so formal fallacy is the correct term. Either way, a straw man fallacy is a type. Regardless, none of this applies to me, and if you wrote less maybe you'd have noticed.

"mInEcRaFtEr0617;c-2089879" wrote:

I just write as much as I have to in order to bring my point across.

And more.