Why change zFinn?

"Liath;c-1752962" wrote:

"TVF;c-1752335" wrote:
Don't listen to that CG, the best thing you ever did was give me the ability to auto the HAAT raid. It's fine.

He’s biased because he never put a zeta on Finn. ;)

I would love for the loop to be fixed, but the fix not apply to HAAT -- I'd drop that zeta in a heartbeat to auto-solo tank.

"Tbirds01;c-1753004" wrote:

Yes, but changing her tenacity or her turn meter when she is toppled would be an easy fix. Otherwise it’d change Finn soloing the HAAT, and him against every meta team, especially revan. He doesn’t hold on defense well still against revan, and he’s not in the top three meta teams right now, so I think we’re safe with Finn as is. I have a feeling more people would be in an uproar about Finn being changed than raid boss Traya.

Easy fix /= appropriate fix. I don't care about HAAT -- let it be auto-able (I'd be quite happy). I don't care about p3 HSR -- let it be auto-able (again, I'd be quite happy). I care about them being backed into a future design corner, where they either have to continue with this stacking tenacity garbage, which was one of the most unfun things about the sith raid, or eliminating the topple mechanic, or giving every raid boss going forward tm on hits when toppled, which could hurt a LOT of different teams (like troopers, bh, clones, Revan-led jedi, etc..., which utilize a lot of bonus attacks/assists). To deal with this situation, CG either has to build in an anti-inFinnite mechanic to each and every single future piece of content where it could pop up, to the potential detriment of other teams, or change the inFinnite mechanic somehow. Good design would be fixing inFinnite once.

As far as "uproar," I'm sure there would be even less uproar if CG just removed p3 from the raid entirely, but as I said earlier, just because the mob wants it, doesn't mean it's the right solution.