Why does Han shoot my Greedo first?

You guys clearly don't know the power of Greedo. He lived like maul did and became snoke.

Snoke is the drug dealer who tried to sell Obi-Wan Death sticks.

In the original theatrical release of the movie, there was only one shot fired, and it was by Han.

The are two later versions where they added in Greedo firing a shot. In the 1997 version, Greedo shoots first. In the 2004 version, they shoot at the same time. There is also a 2011 version where they shortened the frames between shots.

George Lucas had to go and screw with the movie because of "feels".

There is only one version that matters. Han Solo fired the first, and only shot!!

You would think CG/EA would have to side with the creator, considering how long it took them to flag IG88 as a scoundrel.

Taking control away from George Lucas is the best thing that could have happened. Look at episodes 1-3 and the changes to the original for my argument why.

Hopefully Disney can do a better job.

Han shot! Not first/second, Greedo never shot.

Rewatching the video above brought back the disgust if the whole ordeal and what incredibly cheap graphics trying to get the "shots" onto the scene.

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/9d/34/2b/9d342b4f043a9244e4348b6fb493d8fc.jpg

"Goride;618538" wrote:
Because Han shot first!


http://digitalspyuk.cdnds.net/15/49/1024x512/landscape-1449075201-han-solo.png

How the hell is it I have missed seeing this image. I need to make that into a poster and frame it. That is me just about every time I turn my computer on and read anything online. Oh, and yes, Han shot first, second, and last since his was the only shot fired.

"CptCaveman;618935" wrote:
Taking control away from George Lucas is the best thing that could have happened. Look at episodes 1-3 and the changes to the original for my argument why.

Hopefully Disney can do a better job.

Its too late. Force Awakens was a complete rehash joke of a movie, and easily up there with The phantom Menace for the worst of the series(i find 7 to be the worst). At least ep1 had a few good scenes, in particular the final fight scene was masterfully done. ep7 Was just uninspired rehash. It was the only one I've only gone to the theatre once for. I saw it again on DVD, but couldn't finish it. It is that bad. I was groaning and about to walk out the first time I saw it at the Han/Kylo scene. For the death of a main character like that to lack 0 emotion, and to basically be called before it even happens for a non-spoiler watcher is just bad.

Yes; Han shot first, and yes Jar Jar is horrible, but other than that the prequels had much more meat and story to them than 7. Lucas is 10x the director JJ Lensflare will ever be.

"CptCaveman;618935" wrote:
Yes; Han shot first, and yes Jar Jar is horrible, but other than that the prequels had much more meat and story to them than 7. Lucas is 10x the director JJ Lensflare will ever be.

I completely agree, though saying Lucas is 10x better is not saying much when applied to the low bar of Jar Jar Abrams. The only thing I liked about the new movie was the blood on the storm trooper. Star Wars needs to get a lot more dirty.

"People who alter or destroy works of art and our cultural heritage for profit or as an exercise of power are barbarians". - George Lucas