Winning with the entire team specified
no deaths allowed, and one of the characters not yet farmable? That's a new low, CG.
Forum Discussion
Correct, I'm clearly a fan of CGs game and just to reiterate I'm not having a go at them or suggesting what they are doing is wrong. I'm just not a CG fan to an extent that if they said the sky was green, I'd have a go at anyone that suggested it was blue...
Again, there is nothing wrong with CG making conquest harder or creating lots of feats 'linked' (I won't use paywalled, clearly a trigger for some people) to the latest characters. But that is what's happening and that's the point people were making. It's a direction change clearly, cool - no problem, but let's not pretend that's not happening because they've put NS zombie back in!
Side point - nobody has mentioned a problem with changing feats.
Happy to agree to disagree about the subjective nature of the previous conquests. I suppose we will see in the near future if they start putting more feats in (like the phoenix one) that tighten the grip and start eliminating cheese.
Agree with the comment that gated feats have been around from the beginning, but where it was centred around one new character or faction and if you don't have them you accept those points are lost (or cheesed) now they have several gated factions around the latest characters and factions.
Inquisitors, yes they did make it clear they would be needed, I was just making the observation that 85% of the player base don't have them. It's not laziness that people don't get them there are just too many more important characters to chase. I'd also bet when that number hits around 30% of players having them reliced they will stop requiring them for conquest.
Just a final reminder - I'm not complaining about this change in direction just recognising it for what it is. The sky hasnt fallen, but it is still blue.
Anyway I'll let you all move on to the next different opinion someone has. Time will tell if they are 'tightening the grip' or not!
Again, there is nothing wrong with CG making conquest harder or creating lots of feats 'linked' (I won't use paywalled, clearly a trigger for some people) to the latest characters. But that is what's happening and that's the point people were making. It's a direction change clearly, cool - no problem, but let's not pretend that's not happening because they've put NS zombie back in!
Side point - nobody has mentioned a problem with changing feats.
Happy to agree to disagree about the subjective nature of the previous conquests. I suppose we will see in the near future if they start putting more feats in (like the phoenix one) that tighten the grip and start eliminating cheese.
Agree with the comment that gated feats have been around from the beginning, but where it was centred around one new character or faction and if you don't have them you accept those points are lost (or cheesed) now they have several gated factions around the latest characters and factions.
Inquisitors, yes they did make it clear they would be needed, I was just making the observation that 85% of the player base don't have them. It's not laziness that people don't get them there are just too many more important characters to chase. I'd also bet when that number hits around 30% of players having them reliced they will stop requiring them for conquest.
Just a final reminder - I'm not complaining about this change in direction just recognising it for what it is. The sky hasnt fallen, but it is still blue.
Anyway I'll let you all move on to the next different opinion someone has. Time will tell if they are 'tightening the grip' or not!
