Would it be too much to run all 4 TBs every month?

"Legend91;c-2068450" wrote:
It's not about the "time investment", it never was (CG or their shills will tell you otherwise ofc). It's all about the rewards and they'll do anything to keep them low since more rewards = faster progression and less money spent.

It's both.

I think if you are in a guild(like Fury) that easily maxes both Hoth battles than yeah, let's run all 4. That being said, I don't wont my rewards reduced. And since CG would more than likely decrease rewards I say no. More work for the same payout makes 0 sense.

If you in a guild that still requires direction for Hoth than I have no opinion as I do no want to speak for others. But if the rewards were kept as is I would be surprised if they anyone said no.

TB and TW at the same time and on top of that GA and perhaps a raid? Would be a killer schedule. Too much for my taste. Please leave TB and TW on separate weeks.

"TVF;c-2068522" wrote:

"kello_511;c-2068380" wrote:

"TVF;c-2068309" wrote:
Yes, yes it would.

Rewards would be halved to compensate and I really don't want to spend twice as much time on officer duties.

Do you feel that Hoth TB would require a lot of your effort to coordinate?

More than zero.

Especially if we want to max it, which are a couple stars shy of.

So yeah.

This

I don’t want to consider the rewards in this equation, but I’d be very much in favor of running all 4 each month. While Hoth is pretty easy at the point I’m at, I do enjoy the game mode. Territory Battles are my favorite mode. It is at least something that you can always work towards. There is no progression in PVP modes because everyone is progressing so the goal posts are always moving. In TB you know exactly what you need to work towards and can see an end in sight. It feels more rewarding to continue to progress.

"LendersQuiz;c-2068302" wrote:
I can picture a scenario where we would get one of each of the TBs starting with LS Hoth and finishing with LS Geo. Each TB would happen once a month and the first TB would start on the first full week of each calendar month (see image below). This would cause us to have 48 per year (not 52). That's ~double the number of TBs we have now.

To maintain the same level of rewards though, each of the TB's rewards would have to be reduced. I don't think most people would want to do play more TB to end up with the same approx rewards. I would do it, but that's just me.

When do we get TWs then? Isn't there some kind of server issue that prevents them from overlapping with TBs?

The rewards are usually garbage anyway. I just want something to do!! Having about 40 minutes of actual game play per day is boring as hell!!!!

Not gonna happen. And a few of you hit on it. Economy control. They will say it would require too much time press on players and require built wars to run along side territory battles. And for some players that might be true. But the vast majority would welcome it for more rewards, and that's the Crux. Controlling guild currency in the game. Because the whales would be in guilds that would get max rewards easily and be less inclined to drop $100 on gear bundles. And easier for free players to grind out required heros for events. In the end that means less money spent on the game, and they won't threaten that.

If the devs really wanted to "alleviate" the gear crunch up to G12 then it shouldn't be an issue. Or has internal review nixed that as well?