35% per debuffed emeny so over 100% chance if 3 or more enemies are debuffed. With an 80% chance to inflict buff immunity on his aoe, plus other empire characters, he pretty much always gets foresight.

"TaterSalad;901424" wrote:35% per debuffed emeny so over 100% chance if 3 or more enemies are debuffed. With an 80% chance to inflict buff immunity on his aoe, plus other empire characters, he pretty much always gets foresight.That's not how percentages work

"Take_a_Bite;901428" wrote:"TaterSalad;901424" wrote:35% per debuffed emeny so over 100% chance if 3 or more enemies are debuffed. With an 80% chance to inflict buff immunity on his aoe, plus other empire characters, he pretty much always gets foresight.That's not how percentages workThat's exactly how it works here.It adds +35% to the base % for every debuffed enemy.

Concerning TFP, the implementation of his mechanics is not clear: for each of debuff enemy you toss a coin with 35% chance to get foresight, so even at 3 debuff enemies you only have 72% getting foresight (1-0.65^3). With the 5 opponents with debufs it increases to 90%.Unless we know exactly how it is implemented we can't really answer. Mechanics can be found on swgoh.gg

Forum Discussion

DarnedTheRocker

8 years ago

Yeah more like TFP has a 90% chance to gain foresight

Title

characters

32 Replies

scuba75
Legend
8 years ago
"Loose_Lee;902323" wrote:
Foresight dont help against counterattacks...

If he doesn't have it before he attacks correct.
SnakesssOnAPlane
Seasoned Ace
8 years ago
"Thor_Odinson1;902152" wrote:
"Take_a_Bite;901457" wrote:
The percentages do not stack unlike counter chance.
Let's assume for the sake of my laziness of doing the calculation in my head that tfp has 33% chance to gain foresight per enemy.
First chance would be 33%, if that fails then we have another 33% to gain foresight so 33% of 66% is 22%. So 2 debuffed enemies is 55% = 33% + 22%. Another fail leads to 33% of 44% is about 15%. Thus we have about 70% for 3 enemies. Again I made simplifications in the decimal places, but the calculation method is correct

Mmmm yeah this is wrong. It very clearly stacks.

Hate to be a dick, but after the multitude of discussions, with formulas and proof for all to see, you chime in with this?! :p :*