Zetas Crunch

"Isle;c-2448487" wrote:

"herd_nerfer;c-2448486" wrote:

"Notthatguyfrombefore;c-2448469" wrote:

"Salatious_Scrum;c-2448466" wrote:

"PlayerJ;c-2448456" wrote:
There is so much to unpack here.
I can’t unpack it all at the moment because I’m at work.
I don’t have the time to do it at the moment.
I will touch on it a bit more later one.

——————————

However, I want to clear up some confusion.
I’m not talking about Omicrons.
I am talking about Zetas.

Some characters are very good for GAC.
Some characters are very good for Territory Wars.

The Youtubers I watched who told me the above was AhnaldT101 & Songeta.
General Grievous - The Metalloid Monstrosity Zeta is crazy good on GG.
This is what AhnaldT101 said.

However, Players often use General Grievous in Territory Wars vs. GAC.
GG is more of a TW character and putting a Zeta on him would be great if you was a player who prioritize TW.

AhnaldT101 said he didn’t prioritize TW.
He is more on GAC side so he tries to recommend players to put Zeta which are more GAC focused.

Hopefully, that clears up the confusion.

I’m impressed you can say so much so incorrectly. I’m curious though, what team do you think is better in TW than in GAC? Because Grievous and Sep droids isn’t…

I’m not agreeing with PJ, particularly on the point about GAC/TW zetas, but there are some teams which hit a bit harder in TW than GAC when omis are included IMO. Sepi droids with the DDK omi are one example, and arguably so too are Geos with the Poggle omi. Without omis teams are just as useful in both modes.

Possibly PJ is confused as to what the people they’ve been watching have been saying. I wouldn’t be surprised if tubers were talking about teams having more utility in one mode dependent on omis.

Except he explicitly stated that he's not talking about omicrons. He actually believes that some zetas are better in GAC than in TW. I'm guessing he either doesn't realize that fights in TW and GAC are nearly identical without omicrons or he's convinced (again) that he knows something the rest of us don't.

Either way, if I were Ahnaldt I'd be a little annoyed that someone on a public forum is claiming I said something I didn't say. I don't have any problem admitting I'm a fan - I've seen lots of his content - and I've never heard him refer to a "TW zeta" or a "GAC zeta" - because that's just not a thing.

Actually, PJ said: Ahnaldt said GG zeta is amazing. Then said something about players prioritizing GG as a TW squad. Then said Ahnaldt focuses more on GAC and tends to make recommendations with GAC in mind. It’s very misleading based on structure but not technically false.