"thecarterologist958;c-2030662" wrote:
"Malevolan;c-2030465" wrote:
If he's actually sharing accounts with someone he actually should be banned. He claimed a situation that could only happen 1 of 2 ways. Either he lied about not being in the game when he replied to me twice and attacked a second time that first night, or someone else was on his account.
They can check IP's, I cannot. So my only recourse if I suspect someone of sharing accounts, is to report it.
How would you suggest I "prove" he had 2 people sharing the same account? I can't check IP's and there's no way he'd admit it to me if he was.
So... you were trying to stop not just one, but two people from playing the game? One of whom may not even exist. Also, that was the situation before he said anything. When something happen in game, either someone is online, or they are not. No, the smart course of action would be to be patient and actually check something properly, or even better, nothing at all. It's like someone commenting on Facebook saying they aren't logged in, there's no reason to say the accounts been hacked, whether it's the right person on the end or not, they must be lying, because they are. So what you have done is reported someone for cheating because they played the game sensibly but didn't tell you the truth (no obligation to) or roll over at your "polite" demand to leave you alone. Wonder why they took issue with any of that?
I see no problem with having someone banned for account sharing. You're just being contrarian.
and sensibly? No. Sensibly would be doing your fights near your own payout time to get the highest rank possible before payout happens, not hours before when you would more likely get hit backwards and end up with worse ranking.
Can't believe any of you are still arguing that this is a competition issue when he clearly stated it was personal.
He hasn't benefited from this at all.
